Evidence that is obtained illegally is called INADMISSABLE, which means that if investigators miss even 1 little thing in the gathering of said evidence, even unto DNA, the WHOLE case can legally be thrown out immediately. Many CONVICTED criminals have been WRONGFULLY been put to DEATH, because of WRONGFUL oversight, or as I like to call it UNDERSIGHT, of the american judicial system. I live in america, or the US etc.. and I love my country. It's the only truly FREE country in the world, flawed as it may be. Hopefully, my country will see the errors of it's ways, and find faults, where faults need to be found. The errors do not lie in the hearts of men themselves, but in the system that put them there in the first place. I myself have NEVER met a man whom I would never shake the hand of.
No, evidence obtained illegally, including letters that were opened without permission, is generally not admissible in court due to the exclusionary rule, which prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in legal proceedings.
The accused has the right to challenge the admissibility of any evidence used against them at trial. Whether an e-mail or any other evidence is "illegally obtained" is subject to the interpretation of the court, not the accused. If the court rules that evidence is obtained unlawfully, it can be suppressed at trial and not considered.
The exclusionary rule.
exclusionary rule
exclusionary rule
exclusionary rule
exclusionary rule
exclusionary rule
Mapp v. Ohio
In law this is known as the exclusionary rule.
if an unlawful search of your property/residence/vehicle is conducted without your consent, and evidence of a crime is found, its an illegal search, the judge can throw out the evidence if an illegal search was done
Unless you are willing to reveal your source of information, you have NO evidence. Evidence is only able to substantiate claims if it can be proved.