0
What rationale has the US Supreme Court adopted for excluding illegally obtained evidence from criminal trials?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Evidence that may not be used against a defendant in a criminal trial because it was obtained illegally is an example of the?
exclusionary rule
What is the rule that says evidence may not be used against a defendant in a criminal trial if it was obtained illegally.?
In law this is known as the exclusionary rule.
Can illegally obtained email be used in a criminal case?
The accused has the right to challenge the admissibility of any evidence used against them at trial. Whether an e-mail or any other evidence is "illegally obtained" is subject to the interpretation of the court, not the accused. If the court rules that evidence is obtained unlawfully, it can be suppressed at trial and not considered.
What is logical evidence?
Logicial evidence is proving by facts and clear rationale.
Can a letter opened illegally be used in court as evidence?
In America, the 4th Amendment says that evidence cannot be used if it has been illegally obtained, so no.
What has the author Robert Lindsay Sandes written?
Robert Lindsay Sandes has written: 'Criminal practice, procedure and evidence in Eire' -- subject(s): Criminal Evidence, Criminal procedure 'Criminal practice, procedure and evidence in the Irish Free State' -- subject(s): Criminal Evidence, Criminal procedure
What does the exclusionary rule dictate?
The exclusionary rule dictates that any evidence obtained with an improperly received search warrant or evidence obtained without any search warrant would be held inadmissible in a criminal trial.
Policy forbidding the admission of illegally seized evidence?
exclusionary
What is inevitable discovery?
In a criminal procedure, the inevitable discovery rule allows evidence of a defendant's guilt to be admitted as evidence in a trial. The exclusionary rule judges the admissibility of evidence and under the constitutional law, the evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights is sometimes inadmissible for a criminal prosecution in a court of law. In simple terms, the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule allows into evidence illegally seized items that would have been discovered lawfully anyway. This exception allows evidence to be admitted, even though it was seized in violation of the Constitution. In order to successfully assert the inevitable discovery exception, some courts require that the prosecution demonstrate that the police were in the process of actively pursuing a lawful investigation that would have led inevitably to the discovery of the evidence at the time that the evidence was illegally obtained.
What has the author Julian R Hanley written?
Julian R. Hanley has written: 'Introduction to criminal evidence and court procedure' -- subject(s): Criminal procedure, Criminal Evidence 'Criminal justice processes and procedures' -- subject(s): Administration of Criminal justice, Criminal justice, Administration of, Criminal law, Criminal procedure 'Selected cases for legal aspects of criminal evidence'
What is inevitable discovery rule?
In a criminal procedure, the inevitable discovery rule allows evidence of a defendant's guilt to be admitted as evidence in a trial. The exclusionary rule judges the admissibility of evidence and under the constitutional law, the evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights is sometimes inadmissible for a criminal prosecution in a court of law. In simple terms, the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule allows into evidence illegally seized items that would have been discovered lawfully anyway. This exception allows evidence to be admitted, even though it was seized in violation of the Constitution. In order to successfully assert the inevitable discovery exception, some courts require that the prosecution demonstrate that the police were in the process of actively pursuing a lawful investigation that would have led inevitably to the discovery of the evidence at the time that the evidence was illegally obtained.
What was the illegally seized evidence in the mapp case?
Pornographic material inside a suitcase
