Start by defending the benefit realized by the outlay of capital (cash)
basically both are cash outflow but in case of cost we have some financial advantage while in case of expenditure there are no financial advantage.cost is an value of any item.
The expenditure in plan head is planned like( salary,purchase, etc.) but in case of non-plan that is renomn planned expenditure (like administration expenditure,calamity,mischalaneous etc.)
when they see agood case that they could get money out of it
no, the heart of Atlanta case did not develop in New York
"Please do not argue with your brother," the mother said to one of her sons. A tendecy to argue is an annoying trait to have. When you argue, you are just wasting time.
In a complex legal case, the most effective case strategy is to thoroughly analyze the facts, research relevant laws, develop a strong legal argument, and strategically present evidence to support your position. It is important to work closely with your legal team, anticipate potential challenges, and adapt your strategy as needed to achieve the best possible outcome.
go to court and argue your case
american iventiveness and tenoloical progress florished
No one has been able to develop an effective vaccine for HIV because the virus is constantly mutating.The novel starts off a little slow, but as the plot continues to develop it becomes completely engrossing.As the case continues to develop, the list of suspects gets longer and longer.The lead actor seems a bit unsure of who his character is, but I'm sure the character will develop along with the show.
I wanted to argue the law case not just codify them in the office.
Analogizing a case involves drawing parallels between two cases to argue for a similar outcome, based on comparable facts or principles. Distinguishing a case, on the other hand, involves highlighting differences between two cases to argue that they warrant different outcomes based on unique circumstances or legal principles at play.
Precedent reflects past cases that have been decided on, usually by the Federal or State Supreme Courts, whose decisions reflect some similarity to the defenses case. Based on the decision made the defense attorney can argue that the same decision applies to his/her case.