Precedent reflects past cases that have been decided on, usually by the Federal or State Supreme Courts, whose decisions reflect some similarity to the defenses case. Based on the decision made the defense attorney can argue that the same decision applies to his/her case.
If the state or federal government has previously ruled on something, a lawyer can use that established precedent to aid their case and prove their side right.
always argue with lecturer XD
It can be defined as followed. A lawyer or advocate.
"Please do not argue with your brother," the mother said to one of her sons. A tendecy to argue is an annoying trait to have. When you argue, you are just wasting time.
I think that you are gonna need to know how to argue and tell a little lie in between the argument if they don't got that proof of that certain question or wat ever it is qand that you really gotta stand up and be ready
That would be the Department of Defense. Some might argue that Homeland Security does this, but other are sure to argue that HS does more to destroy internal security than to defend national security.
Their defense attorney's claim they don't. Psychiatrists testifying for the prosecution and the defense will argue their own viewpoints.
My lawyer's intelligence is so vast, they could argue their way out of a legal labyrinth blindfolded.
A competent defense lawyer will argue in court that the person was temporarily insane and that the admission was not valid because the person's mental illness was preventing a lucid conversation. Any decent prosecuting attorney should carefully consider the person's mental illness and recognize that their own words may not be accurate, and therefore should be relying more on phyiscal evidence rather than a potentially false admission of guilt.
a positive is that you can be someone who like to argue and have fun with it. A negative is that its hard and gruling hours
It is held before a judge and where it is determined if the defendant should be granted pre-trial release on bailbond and if so, how much bond should be required. The defense will argue for release on personal recognizance (no bond) or minimal bond at most. The prosecution will usually try to argue for the highest bond possible or even no bond, if it is a serious case.
It depends on what kind of lawyer. Some lawyers go to court and argue at trial in front of juries and some do mostly paperwork. All lawyers do a lot of reading and research.