In 1 Corinthians verse 10-12, the author of the letter to the church says that it has come to his attention that they are divided about what they should do and believe.
Apparently some had written to him and ask what they should do, Chapter 1, verse 1. Chapter 7, verse 6 "But I speak this by permission, and not of commandment" meaning this is his opinion and not a direct command from God.
Verse 7 "For I would that all men were even as I myself" he has chosen to remain unmarried. Verse 9, "But if they connot contain, let them marry", Verse 2, "Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and every woman her own husband".
Verse 32, "He that is unmarried careth for the things that belong to the Lord, how he may please the Lord" In other words if a person were not divided between responsibilities of a family he has more time to devote to spreading the gospel.
It will not, just as interracial and interfaith marriage did not destroy the institution.
The Divine Institution of Marriage was created in 2008.
homosexuality does not go against the institution of marriage, much in the same way that being color blind does not go against the institution of marriage.homosexuality does not go against the institution of marriage, much in the same way that being color blind does not go against the institution of marriage.
No. Marriage is an "institution" not a "constitution."
comment on institution of marriage in Tom Jones
marriage is the hardest institution ever
It is an institution of bondage for a woman
There is no importance in marriage.
It doesn't. The legalization of same-sex marriage merely represents an end to the discriminatory exclusion of gays and lesbians from the institution.
All of 1 Corinthians chapter 7
god originated marriage and humans made the institution of marrige and they do with it what they please!
The institution of marriage has existed for centuries as a social and legal union between partners.