I am far from fluent in Latin personally, but an online translation suggests: Secundum obscurum , lux lucis
In the absence of light darkness prevails
The word for dark in Latin is obscuro. The word for light is lucem. The word for night is noctis.
Lex tenebrarum.
Man of Light in latin is "Luce"
Earthworms do not respond to darkness per say, but they do respond to light. although they do not have eyes, they are light sesitive.
No, light is not the absence of darkness. Darkness is nothing, light is something.No, light is not the absence of darkness. Darkness is nothing, light is something.No, light is not the absence of darkness. Darkness is nothing, light is something.No, light is not the absence of darkness. Darkness is nothing, light is something.
"In the absence of light, darkness triumphs."(However, luci should be lucis and vinciuntshould be vincunt. As it stands, the Latin actually says "in the absence for light, darkness binds".)
Some say the absence of light creates it.
Neither can "come first" - for darkness to exist there must be an absence of light. But for light to exist there must be something to burn, and before there was anything burning there would have been darkness. But.... as there would have been nothing to observe the darkness - as nothing can exist without light - then one can say that light and darkness are mutually necessary. You can't have one without the other.
If you meant to say Pocket God, the iPod app, all you do is drag the sun below the horizon.
Nox.
ex lucis ad lucem (possibly)