answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Get tamper data. Redeem and use it? Is it that hard? Omg..

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do you use tamper data on AW surveys without getting flagged?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

What does the word tamper means?

Tamper means to mess with something for example My daughter is tampering with the cords in my living room. compared to My daughter is messing with the cords in my living room. they are similar


What is a shape whose base is circular and who sides tamper up to a point?

A cone would fit the given description


Is the word safely an adjective or noun?

The word safe is a noun and an adjective.The noun 'safe' (safes) is a singular, common, concrete noun; a word for a strong, fireproof and/or tamper proof box for keeping money or valuables.Example: We keep our jewelry in a safe.The adjective 'safe' (safer, safest) describes a noun as free or secure from danger, harm, or loss.Example: We found a safe place to wait out the storm.The noun form for the adjective safe is safeness or safety.


When was the latest writing of the New Testament completed?

The question of when the books of the New Testament were written is controversial, so the question of when the last work in the New Testament was written is also controversial.Most conservative New Testament scholars would place all of the New Testament in the first century AD. There are substantial grounds to accept this judgement, although there are questions on the fringes. Some scholars put the letters of John later, but there are no substantive reasons to reject an earlier date. Similarly, there are no grounds to reject the claim in the book of Jude that it was written by the brother of James, and that this James is the one that Paul describes as the brother of Jesus.Many New Testament scholars either leave the question of the authorship of 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus open, or hold that these works were not written by Paul. The writing style of 1 Timothy and Titus suggests that Paul did not write these works. Furthermore, the theology of 1 Timothy seems not to be strictly Pauline. If these works were not written by Paul it is difficult to date them, with dates between AD 80 and AD 150 being possible. However, there is no reason to seriously question Paul's authorship of 2 Timothy, although scholars have not taken up this point in earnest.Many New Testament scholars also doubt Peter's authorship of 1 Peter, but this doubt seems to be misplaced. It is primarily founded on the proposition that Peter could not have written the Greek prose in that text. In considering this matter, scholars appear to have failed to properly consider the proposition that Peter could have, and probably did, dictate the work in Aramaic, and that someone else created the Greek text.The other reason for doubt about Peter's authorship of this work is that it seems to draw some of its material from Paul's letter to the Ephesians. Yet, if Peter wrote 1 Peter, and it is dated quite early, as is possible, and indeed likely, then this argument carries less weight. Furthermore, the follow-on arguments against Paul's authorship of Ephesians and Colossians fall to the ground, on the grounds that it likely that Paul drew upon 1 Peter when writing these works.For some New Testament scholars, the case against Peter's authorship of 2 Peter is considered to be irrefutable. Nevertheless, it has its weaknesses. They point to the Greek prose of 2 Peter, noting that it is quite different from that in 1 Peter. Yet this is not a difficulty: if the Greek of 1 Peter was from someone who translated his Aramaic, the same thing could have happened with 2 Peter, but with Peter using a different translator. Of more difficulty is the relationship between 2 Peter and Jude, since 2 Peter contains material that seems to be taken from Jude, and it is likely that Jude was written after Peter died.While this is quite difficult to untangle, we should look for the simplest solution that deals with all of the evidence; this is the approach generally favoured by scholars. Such a solution does appear if one is able to posit that 2 Peter actually contains two works. On this basis, one could say that 2 Peter 2:3b-22 (which contains borrowings from Jude) was probably being written in the middle of the 2nd century, and the rest of 2 Peter was written by Peter.On these grounds, one could say that the composite work, 2 Peter, was the last writing of the New Testament to be completed.On the other hand, if it is believed that the questions raised by New Testament scholars about Paul's and Peter's authorship of 1 Timothy, Titus and the fragment of 2 Peter can be successfully rebutted by arguments not considered here, then it is likely that either the Gospel of John, or Revelation was the last writing of the New Testament to be completed.AnswerThe last book of the New Testament to be written was probably 2 Peter, around 150 CE. Scholars normally look forthe simplest explanation that requires the least number of unproven assumptions. Clearly 2 Peter contains most of the second-century Epistle of Jude, with alterations, so its completion must be later than Jude. The hypothesis that parts of 2 Peter were written prior to Jude, possibly by Peter himself, and that a subsequent editor more or less seamlessly inserted the Judematerial adds unnecessary complexity for no purpose other than to allow us to remain comfortable in the belief that Peter wrote at least part of 2 Peter (and of course 1 Peter). If a second-century Christian would feel free to tamper with an epistle actually written by one of the apostles, he would certainly feel free to write an entire epistle in Peter's name, just as others did in Paul's name. Other books in the New Testament that were written long after the apostolic era include the Pastoral epistles (1 Timothy, 2 Timothy, Titus), the Johannine epistles, Jude, 1 Peterand Revelation. The Pastorals, although addressing issues that arose in the second century, are much earlier than 2 Peter, as are the Johannine epistles. The Epistle of Jude declares that the author was not a disciple and that the disciples had lived long before, so is attributed to the second century, but its inclusion in 2 Peter means it must pre-date that epistle. Regardless of how late 1 Peter was written, it also predates 2 Peter. Revelation is an enigma but is generally attributed to the period around the end of the first century. These were therefore all written before 2 Peter. Thus the latest writing of the New Testament was completed around 150 CE.


How do you grade coins?

Grading CoinsGrading coins is an art. Some would have you believe that it is a science, but it is an art that requires some skill. That being said, anyone with one good eye can get a fairly good idea as to the neighborhood of the grade of a coin. It's important to know the grade of a coin because, in general, the higher the grade of a coin, the higher its price.OverviewAmerican coins are most often graded these days on a 70 point scale devised by Dr William Shelby for his famous work, "Penny Whimsy" on early large cents. 0 means that you can pretty much tell that it was once a coin while 70 means that it is perfect. Note that 60 is uncirculated, what the general public would consider perfect, with no wear whatsoever. There is a direct mapping from this scale to the older descriptive terms, but they are not always used the same. Ironically, the official numismatic organization that varies the most from this scale is the EAC (Early American Coppers) society. They tend to undergrade coins with respect to the rest of the industry. The other people that vary from the standard are unscrupulous coin sellers that overgrade coins so that they can sell coins for more money than they are actually worth.If you have absolutely no idea how to grade coins, you have no business buying coins without help. If you do not know how to grade coins for yourself, you will eventually learn, and it could very well be an expensive lesson. When selling coins, you don't have as much of a problem. Simply take the coins to a couple of different dealers and get their opinions as to the grade. Always ask for the grade opinion before asking for a price as it can help in negotiating a fair price.If you are interested in learning to grade coins yourself, I would start with the excellent "Official A.N.A. Grading Standards for United States Coins" published by the ANA. For a very quick overview, keep reading.Getting In the BallparkWhile determining an exact grade requires some skill, getting a ballpark idea is within the realm of everyone who can read this page.Mint State (Unc) - Absolutely no trace of wear.Mint state coins vary from MS-60 to MS-70. As I stated earlier, MS-70 is perfect. No blemishes, good strike, great color, and a lot of other really nit picky stuff. Trust me, any coin you have that isn't slabbed isn't MS-70. It's like winning the lottery, twice. An average shiny new penny from the supermarket is MS-63. A really pretty one with no easily visible marks is MS-65. If you have an average roll of new cents from the supermarket, 2-5 will be MS-60, 5-15 will be MS-61, 25-40 will be MS-63, 5-8 will be MS-64 and 1-2 will be MS-65. If you are exceptionally lucky, one will be MS-66. An MS-68 coin is one in 100,000!Distinguishing the difference between these uncirculated grades is where most of the black magic in coin grading is. Even with years of experience, coin dealers will disagree about these grades. Even the professional grading services aren't 100% consistent within these grade levels. Some coins are very difficult case studies. European coin collectors think that this American system of grading uncirculated coins is just downright crazy.Almost Uncirculated (AU) - Small trace of wear visible on the highest pointsAU coins come in AU-50, AU-55 and AU-58. As a novice, you probably won't be able to tell the difference between AU and Unc coins. I know I have trouble a lot of the time. The most important thing in grading an AU coin is to know is where the high points are on a particular coin so that you can look for the minimal wear there. Practice by taking a new coin from the bank, rub it back and forth on your mouse pad vigorously a few times, and see if you can see the wear. Hold the coin nearly sideways in a bright light so that the light reflects at a low angle off the coin. Look for a difference in how the light reflects from most of the coin versus the very highest points. If it doesn't reflect off of the high points the same way as it does from the rest of the coin, then you probably have an AU coin. Note that most AU-58 coins look much better than most MS-60 coins. One of the weird things about coins is that an ugly uncirculated coin often sells for more than a beautiful coin with barely perceptible wear.Extremely Fine (XF or EF) - Very light wear on only the highest points.XF coins come in XF-40 and XF-45. With an XF coin, you can usually see the wear without messing around too much, but it is a very small amount of wear. There is often some of the mint luster left on the coin. Most of the devices on the coin are clearly defined. For each type of coin, there are different things to look for in determining if a coin meets this demanding grade.Very Fine (VF) - Light to medium wear. All major features are sharp.VF coins come in VF-20, VF-25, VF-30 and occasionally VF-35. The key word here is major. Minor features such as some of the finer hair detail, feathers, etc. will be worn. Take a roll of quarters from the bank. Most of the coins from 1976-1983 or so will likely grade VF. Personally, I specialize in VF coins because they show most of the detail of the coin and are a fraction of the cost of higher grade coins. While they show honest wear, they are still very attractive and detailed. Note that silver and copper coins wear faster than clad coins, so VF probably represents between 1-3 years of use.Fine (F) - Moderate to heavy even wear. Entire design clear and bold.Fine is labelled F-12 in the Sheldon scale. Your average 1965 quarter from circulation is Fine. A lot of the details are gone, but you can still see a good deal of the design.Very Good (VG) - Well worn. Design clear, but flat and lacking details.Very Good is VG-8 on the Sheldon scale. The entire design is weak, but a few details are visible. Full rims are nearly always a requirement for this grade. A full rim means that you can see a line around the edge of the coin where it was raised up.Good (G) - Heavily worn. Design and legend visible but faint in spots.On some coins, full rims are not required for this grade. You must be able to read the date and mint mark.Almost Good (AG) - Outlined design. Parts of date and legend worn smooth.This is a used up coin. You should be able to make out the date (possibly with some effort). Often, only parts of the last two digits will be visible.Fair (Fair) - You can identify the coin as to its type.There may be holes, it might be bent, or it might just have a LOT of honest wear. You may or may not see the date depending on the type and the nature of the wear. Fair coins are also sometimes called "filler" coins. That is because you can buy them very cheaply to fill the holes in your collection. Otherwise, you might never be able to afford the coin. Many people collect fair condition coins, especially the rarer dates and types. Dateless buffalo nickels, for example, are still worth about a dime. Some of the earlier type coins may be worth $50 or more in fair condition.Basal State (Basal) - You can identify the lump of metal as being a coin.Basal state coins have extraordinarily low value. A basal state large cent, for example, might sell for a nickel.ExceptionsOccasionally, you will find a poorly struck coin that looks like it has wear, but is really uncirculated. To see a good example of this, look at the bottom of the shoulder of most uncirculated Lincoln cents from the mid to late 1990s. It will always look like it has a little wear, but it is just a problem with strike. While there is a premium for well struck coins, the primary determination of value is from wear. Some coins are nearly always weakly struck. For example, early coins from New Orleans often show weakness in striking. The reverse of many seated dimes is often weakly struck, etc.Coins with scratches, holes, very dark toning, pitting, corrosion, fake color, retooling, repairs and other problems are severely downgraded.Sometimes you will see coins graded in in-between numbers such as F-15 or VG-10 or VF/XF. There is typically not very much of a premium for these in-between grades, so in many cases they can represent a good value.Some early silver and gold coins have adjustment marks. These do not effect the grade, but can affect the value in a similar fashion.ExamplesThere are many examples of coins in different grades on the site. I would invite you to visit the for sale pages to see pictures of coins in different grades. In addition, I will soon put the grade of the coins in the virtual type collection so that you can compare there as well.It is prohibitive at this point to have pictures of all coin types in all grades on the web. But there are CD-ROMs available with a full type set in all grades.Net GradingNet grading is a term used when referring to coins that have problems. For example, a coin might have XF wear, but have been scratched, corroded, cleaned, etc. Often, such a coin will be given a "net" grade, say VF reflecting the undesirable issues. This is meant to reflect that while the coin may technically grade XF, the market value should be somewhere close to that of an average VF coin. While completely problem free coins are the exception, net grading is probably applied to less than a fourth of the coins out there.Importance of Coin GradingOnce a coin is determined to be authentic, an accurate grade must be arrived at in order to value the piece properly. What is the big deal about determining a coin's grade so accurately? Minute differences in grade can mean thousands of dollars difference in a coin's market value. This is especially true in Uncirculated or Mint State grades. Other times, a coin might be so rare that the difference between a Very Fine and an Extremely Fine specimen can make a large difference in a coin's value. Consider a coin with fewer than 12 known survivors, 11 of which are in poor condition, but one piece is in Extremely Fine condition. The finest of these coins may bring multiples of the total value for all of the other pieces combined.Grading is SubjectiveBeginners will have the hardest time with uncirculated grades. An uncirculated coin doesn't necessarily mean that its never been touched by human hands. How did it get made then? No, it means that the coin didn't actually perform its intended function in the channels of commerce, i.e. it did not circulate. Uncirculated coins have different grades based on how the coin was treated once minted. Some have a lot of bag marks from being tossed in a bag with others...and possibly taken on a 200 mile stagecoach ride to the bank of destination.Every coin series has its particular features that show rub or friction before the rest of the coin. Many coins with just a little rub are classified as AU or About Uncirculated coins. Generally speaking, the major difference in a grade of AU and a grade of EF or Extremely Fine is one of luster. An EF specimen will be pretty much "all there", i.e. the features, design or devices as they're called, have not been worn away. As a coin continues to be used in circulation, it sees grades such as Very Fine(VF), Fine(F) and on down the line getting progressively worse until a Basil state or condition of Poor-1 has been reached.Once you fully understand and appreciate that grading is a subjective art, you're halfway home. Grading of rare coins is anything but an exact science; however, grading is not just a bunch of smoke and mirrors either.The absolutely necessary reference for grading U.S. Coins is the Official A.N.A. Grading Standards for United States Coins, published by the American Numismatic Association in 1987. For those interested, this title is available for purchase in our Books & Periodicals section.Constant Change of ScopeIn 1986, a new idea for grading coins became a reality with the creation of a third-party grading and encapsulating service, the Professional Coin Grading Service or PCGS as we know them. Because of the popularity of this service, others soon followed. I should note that the A.N.A. had been grading coins for a fee prior to the creation of PCGS, but the coins were not encapsulated in a tamper-proof holder. Today, many rare coin dealers have a good portion of their rare coins housed in the inert holders from one or more of grading services such as those listed below:Professional Coin Grading Service (PCGS)Numismatic Guaranty Corporation (NGC)Independent Coin Grading (ICG)American Numismatic Authentication Collector Services (ANACS)Sovereign Entities Grading Service (SEGS)Photograde Coin Institute (PCI)Because of the 3rd-party grading services' guarantees, you now have a safe way of avoiding counterfeits and extremely overgraded coins at the very least. Still, some collectors avoid coins in these holders for one reason or another. This is perfectly fine, especially for those who have developed a good knowledge on coin grading and authentication. Still, when it comes time to sell, many times these collectors will have their coins professionally graded prior to being offered on the market.The Future of Coin GradingAttempts have been made and research continues on a full-proof grading method performed by computers that will objectively score a coin based on luster, number of contact marks, fullness of strike, overall planchet condition and other factors. While I believe we may see this technique refined to the point of being used as the foundation to grading rare coins, I do not believe that collectors and dealers will view a particular specimen in the exactly the same light. Computers cannot rate beauty without a programmer telling the machine exactly how beauty is defined. In other words, the eye appeal factor, which is a big one to consider in my opinion, cannot be easily assigned by a computer.Only PCGS and NGC guarantee there value.....Still done the Old fashiioned way with these pros....They are the two top coin graders hands down:-)~