I would like to give you this gift.
I should get going bye.
as per my knowledge of English would have should use with active voice and would have been use with passive voice sentences for ex - 1. had i been there i would have done this . 2.It would have been very nice if had been there.
we should use had if the sentence is in past tence
No. It is slang and should not be used in formal English
For places, In is used in British English At would be used in Amercian English
The word English is always capitalize but not the word class. It should be English class.
That would be immpossible. You would be unable to teach non English speaking people
Not in English...in French, for example, you would, but not in English.
There may be special meanings of "formal" and "informal" English with which I am not familiar. Formal English would be "standard English", and would be of more importance in written communication. Standard English would be the use of vocabulary and grammar that is as free as possible from idiomatic, slang or otherwise specialized use that would not be universally accepted or understood by fluent speakers world-wide. Informal English would be the English that local communities use, with all the idiomatic, slangy and quirky richness that that implies.
You should learn to speak proper English but if your asking What would be the connection to your brothers wife then it would be sister in law But you should really write proper English
Rakastan sinua. I would say that this is what you use when you're IN LOVE with somebody, such as a girlfriend, you should not say that to your mom or anything like that.
I would use meters
the use of the simple future in French is the same as the future tense in English. In English people would use the form "will" (+verb).