0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the prototype of a copy constructor for a class X?
class X { public: X(); // default constructor X(const X& x); // copy constructor // ... }; int main(void) { X objx1; //normal ctor X objx2 = x1; // copy ctor X x3(x2); // copy ctor }
What is a constructoris it mandatory to use constructor in a class?
You always should define default constructor for your class. You must also define a copy constructor for your class if there are any pointers in the class. While it is not mandatory, failure to provide a default constructor can result in bad behavior, and failure to provide a copy constructor when you have pointers in the class will result in bad behavior. For example, without a default constructor, the compiler will not fully initialize the attributes of the class. It will initialize the virtual function table, and call base class constructors, but that is all - the attributes could be random garbage. For another example, without a copy constructor, the compiler will generate one that simply makes a bit wise copy of the attributes. If these attributes contain pointers, then you have two pointers to the same object, not necessarily a good thing, especially if one of them get "deleted".
How do you invoke the constructor function in c plus plus?
There is no such thing as a constructor function in C++ (constructors have no return value, not even void, and cannot be called like regular functions). Constructors are invoked rather than called directly, either by declaring a static variable of the class type, or via the C++ new operator.
When a class uses dynamic memory what member function should be provided by class?
the copy constructor
What is the method of constructor overloading in c plus plus?
Constructor overloading, just like any function's overloading, is where more than one configuration of parameters exists for the function. Based on the number and type of the parameters, different versions of the function can be resolved by the linker. This is typically used in the constructor as the default constructor (no parameters), the copy constructor (one reference parameter of the same type as the class), and the conversion constructor (any other combination of parameters).
What is the prototype of a copy constructor for a class X?
class X { public: X(); // default constructor X(const X& x); // copy constructor // ... }; int main(void) { X objx1; //normal ctor X objx2 = x1; // copy ctor X x3(x2); // copy ctor }
How do you declare constructor in cpp?
More or less as you would any other function, except there is no return type (not even void) and an initialisation list can be placed between the declaration and the definition that follows it. The initialisation list allows your constructor to call base class constructors besides the default constructor as well as initialise member variables according to the parameters passed to your constructor. The constructor's name must be the name of the class. Note that if you don't declare any constructors, the compiler generates both a default and copy constructor. If any constructor is declared you lose the default constructor unless you declare one yourself. The copy constructor is always present but must be overridden if your class contains pointers to memory allocated to the class itself. If you don't, the compiler generated copy constructor will perform a member-wise copy of the member variables, resulting in a shallow copy of the pointers themselves, rather than a deep copy of the memory they point to. The copy constructor must accept a constant reference to the same class of object.
What is a constructoris it mandatory to use constructor in a class?
You always should define default constructor for your class. You must also define a copy constructor for your class if there are any pointers in the class. While it is not mandatory, failure to provide a default constructor can result in bad behavior, and failure to provide a copy constructor when you have pointers in the class will result in bad behavior. For example, without a default constructor, the compiler will not fully initialize the attributes of the class. It will initialize the virtual function table, and call base class constructors, but that is all - the attributes could be random garbage. For another example, without a copy constructor, the compiler will generate one that simply makes a bit wise copy of the attributes. If these attributes contain pointers, then you have two pointers to the same object, not necessarily a good thing, especially if one of them get "deleted".
How do you invoke the constructor function in c plus plus?
There is no such thing as a constructor function in C++ (constructors have no return value, not even void, and cannot be called like regular functions). Constructors are invoked rather than called directly, either by declaring a static variable of the class type, or via the C++ new operator.
What is overloaded constructor in oop?
Overloading a function simply means providing the same function name with different argument types. Class constructors are no different. In fact, even if you declare no constructors in a class, there will be two compiler-generated constructor overloads provided for you: a default constructor; and a copy constructor. If you declare any other constructors, the compiler-generated default constructor will no longer be generated. You must declare your own default constructor if you require one. The copy constructor is always generated, however the default implementation only performs a member-wise copy of the class members. If your class contains a pointer to allocated memory you must provide your own copy constructor to perform a deep-copy of those pointers, so each instances "owns" its own copy of the memory.
When a class uses dynamic memory what member function should be provided by class?
the copy constructor
Why you require constructor in cpp?
Constructors are not a requirement of CPP. A default constructor and copy constructor are automatically generated by the compiler for every class you create when no constructors are declared. The only time you need to declare a constructor is when you wish to override the default behaviour of the generated constructors, to ensure the class is correctly initialised. When any constructor is declared, the default constructor is no longer generated by the compiler -- you must define your own default constructor (one that has no parameters, or where all the parameters have default values). The copy constructor is always generated for you regardless of how many other constructors you declare. But if the class contains pointers to allocated memory that is "owned" by the class then you must override the generated copy constructor with your own copy constructor. This is to ensure the memory is deep copied (the generated copy constructor only performs a shallow, member-wise copy of the members). Otherwise two objects of the same class will end up pointing at the same memory, which would be disastrous if either one were to be deleted. The other instance would be automatically invalidated because it would point to memory that was released by the other instance's destructor.
Is it mandatory to use the construtors in a class in c plus plus?
No. If you do not provide a default constructor, the compiler will provide a default constructor that simply allocates memory for the class, but it will not initialize the members of the class. If you do not provide a copy constructor, then the compiler will provide a copy constructor that allocates memory for the class, and then copies the member's data from class to class. This is bad if the class contains pointers, because only the pointer will be copied - the objects to which the pointers point will not be copied - and you could wind up deleting an object and then using it after deletion, with potentially devastating consequences. So, yes, it is mandatory, from a good practices point of view, and just plain mandatory when the class has pointers, to always provide a default constructor and a copy constructor, along with the appropriate destructor.
What is the method of constructor overloading in c plus plus?
Constructor overloading, just like any function's overloading, is where more than one configuration of parameters exists for the function. Based on the number and type of the parameters, different versions of the function can be resolved by the linker. This is typically used in the constructor as the default constructor (no parameters), the copy constructor (one reference parameter of the same type as the class), and the conversion constructor (any other combination of parameters).
Does Java support copy constructor?
No. Java does not support copy constructor
What is meant by copy constructor overloading?
It is meaningless. Copy constructors cannot be overloaded. You either use the compiler-generated default copy constructor or you define your own. Either way, there can only ever be one copy constructor. The purpose of the copy constructor is to construct a new instance of a class (a new object) from an existing instance of the same class (an existing object). By default, the new object's members will be a bitwise copy (a shallow copy) of the existing object's members. If the class acquires a resource through a member pointer, a user-defined copy constructor must be provided in order to perform a deep copy of that pointer, otherwise you end up with two objects sharing the same resource. This problem does not exist when using smart pointers or resource handles rather than raw pointers.
Which class methods does the compiler generate automatically if you don't provide them explicitly?
Default constructor: X()Copy constructor: X(const X&)Copy assignment operator: X& operator=(const X&)Move constructor: X(X&&)Move assignment operator: X& operator=(XX&)Destructor: ~X()By default, the compiler will generate each of these operations if a program uses it. However, if the programmer declares any constructor for a class, the default constructor for that class is not generated. If the programmer declares a copy or move operation, no copy, move or destructor is generated. If the programmer declares a destructor, no move operation is generated (a copy constructor is generated for backward compatibility).We can also suppress generation of specific operations with the =delete pseudo-initialiser:class X {public:X (const X&) =delete; // suppress the compiler-generated copy operationsX& operator=(const X&) =delete;// ...};
