He had to pull the sword from the stone, then Arthur had to keep doing it again and again to proves to other leaders that he was the King.
There is limited historical evidence to prove the existence of King Arthur as a historical figure. Much of what is known about him comes from medieval legends and folklore rather than concrete historical records. Some historians believe that King Arthur was a composite figure or that his story is based on legends of multiple historical figures.
There is no concrete historical evidence to prove that King Arthur was a real living person. The stories of King Arthur are largely based on folklore, legends, and myths rather than documented historical accounts.
Right before King Arthur died, he passed on the throne to Constantine the Third of Britain.
Test of holy kingdom Knight.
There is no anvil in Athurian myth, nor were there any anvils in Medeval period. You may be thinking of the Stone. King Arthur extracted the sword from the stone to prove he was the true king of England.
There is no historical evidence to definitively prove that King Arthur existed. The stories and legends of King Arthur are believed to be based on a mixture of historical figures and folklore. While some scholars argue that there may have been a King Arthur-like figure in early medieval Britain, his existence remains a subject of debate and uncertainty.
"Not might makes right, but might for right"
Yes he deserves to be king, because at the time of his birth, Merlin asked King Uther if Arthur should be the rightful heir to the throne, and Uther responds with yes. Therefore, it is his birth right that he becomes king.
King Arthur and Kay go to London to participate in a tournament where knights from all over gather to compete. It is a way for Arthur to showcase his skills and establish his reputation as a formidable knight in the kingdom. Additionally, it is an opportunity for Arthur to prove himself as a worthy successor to the throne.
Unfortunately, there may not even be enough evidence to prove that he actually existed. And, if he really did exist, he would be long dead by now.
There is no concrete historical evidence that proves King Arthur was a real person. The stories of King Arthur are largely based on myth and legend, with some scholars suggesting that he may have been a composite of multiple historical figures. The lack of reliable contemporary records and the fantastical elements of the Arthurian legend make it difficult to establish the existence of a historical King Arthur.