He using a child's perspective to an adult problem and letting the child show why things have to be the way they are just because the people of that age and time believe in a certain way. That things are Iron clad no matter if the man is innocent, how could a white person be wrong. The child wonders why the adults just won't believe the defendant, Tom and why they believe the battered girl who has been harassed by her father to lie about the bruises she has because of his drunken rage.
The child also learns the respect that the ***** people have for Aticus
Finch
by waiting until he leaves court and standing
up as he passes by. They don't feel the same way about Aticus
Finch as a white person would feel about a black person no matter what amount of good that black person would do. The child wonders why the grown ups just have set perceptions about things in life and the way they make up their mind not to change anything because it is what it is. Just like the neighbor that the child overall learns to trust and offer comfort to making up her own mind instead of taking prejudice advice from ignorant adults who until this day and age some have not changed their ways.
Certain people will always have certain opinions and these children of Aticus
Finch are smart and have made up their own mind as to what is right and what is wrong and how to go about doing it and believing it for themselves even if the old fashioned grown ups will never change their superior minds. All of those people in that town believed that that man was guilty and the other man crazy just because they never took the time to actually find out why because it was more convenient to have an easy blame than to change the ways of a wicked man who abused his daughter or a misunderstood harmless man who never hurt a sole. The children were brave enough to come to their own conclusions as most of us Americans should do today. We should be leaders instead of followers and think before accepting..
The story possibly could have change with the results being more adamant if they were told from an adult prospective.
It sure was a story with a good moral and one I hope changed many peoples ways of thinking and Aticus
Finch was a very brave man to have lived in those times in the deep south. When if you were a certain person your life was already planned out for you.
Harper Lee's choice of Scout as the narrator gives readers a child's perspective of the events in the novel. This allows for a more innocent and unbiased view of the world around her, highlighting the underlying themes of innocence and morality. Scout's narration also adds a sense of authenticity and emotional depth to the story.
If you mean in To Kill a Mockingbird, Scout is significant as the narrator, because it gives the perspective of a child, when facing adult situations, like rape, racism, and death. Also, in those days, men were typically dominant, and these behaviors were learned as children, so the fact that Scout, a girl is narrating the story involving her older brother shows her perspective.
Children never fully understand events in life, or adults' thinking. Scout as narrator could only tell parts of the story as she knew it, and tell some more as she learned more. For example: Bo's story.
Since Scout is a child, a young girl, we see the story through both of those filters. Youth also means a character does not have all the information but is learning. At some points, readers can see Scout gaining new insights and understandings. An older character could not tell a story in the same way a child would tell it.
Seeing events from the narrator's point of view limits understanding because the narrator's perspective could be biased or unreliable. For example, the narrator's emotions, experiences, or beliefs might color their interpretation of events, leading to a skewed portrayal. This can be seen in the text when the narrator's personal opinions intrude on the description of events, clouding the reader's perception of the truth.
He can only relate events or describe objects he personally witnesses.
It didn't . There is over 100 years difference in the events.
The narrator of To Kill A Mockingbird, is Jean-Louise Finch, more commonly known as Scout. Scout is arguably the main character in TKAM as well as the narrator, however when narrating she is looking back on the events as a adult. Thus the events are recounted first-hand, from a child's point of view, whilst also being described in retrospect - the story/plot evolves from a child's POV, with the hindsight of maturity. It's always useful to consider the effect this has on the reader :)
An unreliable narrator is a character who may misrepresent or distort the events in a story due to their biases, mental state, or lack of understanding. This narrative technique can create suspense, challenge readers' perceptions, and prompt them to question the veracity of the story being told.
A homodiegetic narrator is a character within the story who narrates the events from their own perspective. Their purpose is to provide insight into their own thoughts, emotions, and experiences, offering a more intimate understanding of the story's events. This narrator adds depth to the storytelling and allows readers to connect more closely with the protagonist.
The narrator tells the story, but it is the reader who controls how events are imagined. The narrator's point of view determines the sequence of events. The narrator must know what all characters think at all times. The narrative will change depending on the narrator's tone and point of view.
The main purpose of a narrator in a story is to provide context, guide the reader through the plot, and offer insights into the characters' emotions and motivations. The narrator's perspective helps shape the reader's understanding of the story's events.
Seeing events solely from the narrator's point of view can limit understanding because it provides only one perspective, potentially skewing the interpretation of events. It may not provide a full picture of what is happening or the motivations of other characters involved, leading to a biased or partial understanding.
Scout, the narrator of the novel, seems to have a clear understanding of the events she is relating. She is able to reflect on and make sense of what is happening around her, providing insightful observations and reflections. Scout's perspective offers a nuanced and thoughtful understanding of the complex events in the novel.
The narrator might not be aware of the thoughts or actions of other characters.
The type of narrator that can move freely between any number of characters and has a complete understanding of all characters, events, and situations is an omniscient narrator. This narrative perspective provides a broad view of the story, allowing the narrator to know and convey the thoughts, feelings, and actions of all characters.