0
Hobbes believed that just actions are those that are in accordance with the social contract and the laws established by the sovereign to maintain order and prevent conflict. Unjust actions, according to Hobbes, are those that violate the laws and disrupt the peace and security of society.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between Hobbes and Locke?
Hobbes believed humans are inherently selfish and require a strong central authority to maintain order, while Locke believed in natural rights and the importance of limited government to protect these rights. Hobbes focused on the need for a social contract to prevent chaos, while Locke emphasized the right to rebel against unjust governments.
What statement is not true about John Locke and Thomas Hobbes?
One statement that is not true about John Locke and Thomas Hobbes is that they both believed that individuals had an innate right to rebel against unjust governments. In reality, while Locke argued that individuals had the right to rebel against governments that violated their natural rights, Hobbes did not advocate for rebellion and believed in a strong, centralized authority to prevent chaos and uphold social order.
What is the difference in worldview between John Locke and Thomas Hobbes?
John Locke believed in natural rights, social contract theory, and the idea that individuals have the right to revolt against an unjust government. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, believed in a more pessimistic view of human nature, emphasizing the need for a strong central authority to maintain order and prevent chaos. Locke's worldview focused more on individual liberty and limited government, while Hobbes prioritized the need for strong and absolute political authority.
How does Socrates argue that doing what is unjust actually harms the doer of the injustice most of all?
Socrates argues that doing what is unjust corrupts the soul of the doer by instilling a sense of moral wrongness and disorder. This corruption ultimately causes more harm to the doer in terms of their spiritual well-being and personal integrity than any external consequences. In doing what is unjust, the individual compromises their own moral character and inner peace, leading to a deeper and more lasting harm than any temporary gains from the unjust actions.
What is the opposite meaning of unfairness?
Fairness is the opposite of unfairness. Fairness refers to treating everyone with equality and justice, while unfairness pertains to actions or decisions that are biased or unjust.
What is the difference between Hobbes and Locke?
Hobbes believed humans are inherently selfish and require a strong central authority to maintain order, while Locke believed in natural rights and the importance of limited government to protect these rights. Hobbes focused on the need for a social contract to prevent chaos, while Locke emphasized the right to rebel against unjust governments.
What is the Difference between unjust and injustice?
"Unjust" is used to describe actions, decisions, or situations that are not fair or based on principles of morality. "Injustice" refers to the presence of unfairness, bias, discrimination, or violation of rights in a broader context, often involving systemic or societal issues. In other words, injustice encompasses a broader scope and impact compared to individual acts that are unjust.
What is the definition of wise minority?
-identifies unjust laws. -speaks against unjust laws. -willing to accept the consequences of his or her actions.
Which is an argument used by Nelson Mandela in his speech?
his actions were not wrong because the laws were unjust
In nelson Mandelas speech what was his main argument?
his actions were not wrong because the laws were unjust ;)
Nelson Mandela's speech what was his main argument?
his actions were not wrong because the laws were unjust ;)
What statement is not true about John Locke and Thomas Hobbes?
One statement that is not true about John Locke and Thomas Hobbes is that they both believed that individuals had an innate right to rebel against unjust governments. In reality, while Locke argued that individuals had the right to rebel against governments that violated their natural rights, Hobbes did not advocate for rebellion and believed in a strong, centralized authority to prevent chaos and uphold social order.
Who was the critical thinker and American philosopher who advocated civil disobedience when laws are unjust?
Henry David Thoreau was the critical thinker and American philosopher who advocated civil disobedience when laws are unjust. His essay "Civil Disobedience" inspired many future activists and leaders to peacefully resist unjust government actions.
In law terms what does unjust enrichment mean?
Unjust enrichment refers to a situation where one party has received a benefit or payment that they are not entitled to, usually at the expense of another party. It often leads to legal claims or actions seeking to recover the unjustly gained benefit.
How do government change according to polybius?
They Cycle Between Just And Unjust Forms Of Government.
What is the difference in worldview between John Locke and Thomas Hobbes?
John Locke believed in natural rights, social contract theory, and the idea that individuals have the right to revolt against an unjust government. Thomas Hobbes, on the other hand, believed in a more pessimistic view of human nature, emphasizing the need for a strong central authority to maintain order and prevent chaos. Locke's worldview focused more on individual liberty and limited government, while Hobbes prioritized the need for strong and absolute political authority.
What are acts of injustice?
that is too simple, what would you consider unjust actions? is it something that disturbs the balance of the world and the world we live in? is it impiety? how would you define such acts?
