0
How does Socrates argue that doing what is unjust actually harms the doer of the injustice most of all?
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Would John Rawls argue that it is unjust to give some people more opportunity than others?
True
When does Socrates begin to challenge his students?
From the word 'go'. His teaching method was to let students give opinions and argue them out amongst each other, with himself interjecting to keep them thinking constructively.
What is Socrates philosophy?
he beliefs of Socrates, as distinct from those of Plato, are difficult to discern. Little in the way of concrete evidence exists to demarcate the two. The lengthy theories given in most of the dialogues are those of Plato, and some scholars think Plato so adapted the Socratic style as to make the literary character and the philosopher himself impossible to distinguish. Others argue that he did have his own theories and beliefs, but there is much controversy over what these might have been, owing to the difficulty of separating Socrates from Plato and the difficulty of interpreting even the dramatic writings concerning Socrates. Consequently, distinguishing the philosophical beliefs of Socrates from those of Plato and Xenophon is not easy and it must be remembered that what is attributed to Socrates might more closely reflect the specific concerns of these thinkers.
Was Socrates crazy for trying to wake up the people of Athens?
One could argue that since Socrates was eventually sentenced to death for heresy, he was at least imprudent, in his philosophical teaching. But on the other hand, had he lived a cautious and prudent life, keeping his ideas to himself to avoid causing controversy, no one today would remember who he was. It may be that his accomplishments, as one of history's most influential philosophers, outweigh his shortened lifespan. In any event, I would not call Socrates crazy.
Was socrates a rationalist?
Yes, Plato and Socrates believed that they proved knowledge was innate by giving a maths problem to a slave boy and getting him to work it out without assistance, only indicating when what he said was wrong; thereby, they demonstrated how the knowledge needed to solve the problem was not acquired, so must be innate. However there are flaws to this experiment; whether he was aware of it or not, it would have been very difficult for Socrates to remain completely unhelpful to the slave, with his intonation and body language affecting the boys' perception of the questions he asked. This can even be extended to argue that by telling the slave when he got the wrong answer, he was teaching him since this then eliminated one method at a time until he eventually found the right one. Even in asking the questions, Socrates was educating the boy in demonstrating the possibility for him to acquire this knowledge; it is likely that his lack of education would mean that he would never ask the questions himself; Socrates, an educated man, would ask them because he had been conditioned to do so through education.
What was Henry David Thoreau primary purpose in writing the civil disobedience?
Henry David Thoreau's primary purpose in writing "Civil Disobedience" was to argue for individual resistance to unjust government actions, particularly in the form of passive resistance to unjust laws. Thoreau believed that individuals have a moral obligation to refuse to participate in injustice and to act according to their own conscience.
What do the lawyers for Brown argue?
Separate schools for students of different races are unjust and unlawful.
Would John Rawls argue that it is unjust to give some people more opportunity than others?
True
Was the Hamburger Hill battle just or unjust?
The question of whether the Hamburger Hill battle was just or unjust is subjective and depends on individual perspectives. From an ethical standpoint, some argue that the battle was unjust as it resulted in heavy casualties without significant strategic gains. Others contend that it was a necessary military operation to control the area and deny enemy access. Ultimately, the judgment of justice or injustice is open to debate.
What did Martin Luther King Jr.'s Letter from a Birmingham Jail argue?
People should resist unfair laws.people should disobey unjust laws.
What sociological perspective would argue that the US family contributes to social injustice and denies women opportunities that are commonly extended to men?
Conflict Perspective
What did Martin Luther king Jr letter from Birmingham jail argue?
people should disobey unjust laws~apex
How were the views of Socrates different from those of the Sophists?
The Sophists were hired by the wealthy to speak on any subject. Their teachings were based on no knowledge of the material and used well-formed words to persuade people to believe in them. Their view was that knowledge and understanding were not necessary if the augment made sense. Socrates was different from the Sophists in that he believed knowledge and understanding was key to happiness. Socrates did not argue points he did not believe in, and did not offer arguments for sale. Socrates view of knowledge and understanding was; Knowledge = virtue = happiness
When does Socrates begin to challenge his students?
From the word 'go'. His teaching method was to let students give opinions and argue them out amongst each other, with himself interjecting to keep them thinking constructively.
What did Martin Luther King Jr's letters from a Birmingham jail argue?
people should resist unfair laws (apex)
What is the name of the game where you talk to two people in their apartment by actually typing things in and you can actually make them argue with each other?
Facade
What is Socrates philosophy?
he beliefs of Socrates, as distinct from those of Plato, are difficult to discern. Little in the way of concrete evidence exists to demarcate the two. The lengthy theories given in most of the dialogues are those of Plato, and some scholars think Plato so adapted the Socratic style as to make the literary character and the philosopher himself impossible to distinguish. Others argue that he did have his own theories and beliefs, but there is much controversy over what these might have been, owing to the difficulty of separating Socrates from Plato and the difficulty of interpreting even the dramatic writings concerning Socrates. Consequently, distinguishing the philosophical beliefs of Socrates from those of Plato and Xenophon is not easy and it must be remembered that what is attributed to Socrates might more closely reflect the specific concerns of these thinkers.
