Socrates argues against Meletus that he cannot knowingly corrupt the youth because it would be against his self-interest, as the well-being of the youth would also benefit him. He also argues that it is contradictory for him to believe in other spiritual beings while also being accused of not believing in the gods. Socrates reasons that it does not make sense for him to intentionally harm Athens by corrupting its youth.
Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon were the three accusers who brought charges against Socrates.
Socrates presents Meletus with a dilemma by questioning whether he believes that Socrates corrupts the youth intentionally or unintentionally. If Meletus answers that it's intentional, then Socrates wouldn't harm his own soul intentionally. If he answers unintentional, then there would be no need for punishment. This creates a contradiction in Meletus's argument.
One of Socrates' accusers was Meletus, a young poet who accused him of impiety and corrupting the youth of Athens.
Socrates is questioning the validity of Meletus's accusations by refuting his claims and pointing out inconsistencies in his arguments. He is trying to expose the weaknesses in Meletus's case in order to defend himself and show that the accusations are unfounded.
Meletus charged Socrates with corrupting the youth of Athens and with impiety for not believing in the city's gods.
Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon were the three accusers who brought charges against Socrates.
One of Socrates' accusers was Meletus, a young poet who accused him of impiety and corrupting the youth of Athens.
Socrates is using an Ethos argument. His words are directed more to the audience and whoever overhears, than to Meletus. In his comments, "Nobody will believe you, Meletus, and I am pretty sure that you do not believe yourself. I cannot help thinking, men of Athens, that Meletus is reckless ..." Socrates attacks Meletus' veracity, his truthfulness, and whether anyone should trust him. To switch to a modern scene, this would be like yelling at a friend during an argument, "Everyone knows you are a cheat! You cheat on homework; you cheat on tests; for all we know, you recklessly cheat in everything you do!" The point has less to do with truth as with undermining the other person's power by undermining it in the hearer's mind.
Apex :) Ethos. answered by - The Jarizzle
Meletus charged Socrates with corrupting the youth of Athens and with impiety for not believing in the city's gods.
Socrates says that only horse trainers can improve a horse. He finds it odd that any person could in turn improve another person.
When he is found guilty by the jury, Meletus supports sentencing Socrates to death. It is in response to this recommendation that Socrates argues that, since he was in fact assisting in the upbringing of the youth of Athens, he should be given a fine, which he could pay with the help of his friends.
How did the sophists and Socrates advance the tradition of reason and humanis
Sophists focused on rhetoric and persuasive speech to win arguments, emphasizing practical skills and relativism. Socrates, on the other hand, promoted critical thinking and the search for objective truth through dialogue and questioning, prioritizing ethics and virtue. Both advanced the tradition of reason by challenging traditional beliefs and encouraging individuals to think for themselves.
The Socratic method of teaching forced students to use their reason to answer questions. This method involves a series of questions and answers designed to stimulate critical thinking and illuminate ideas. It encourages students to think for themselves and come to their own conclusions through reasoning.
Socrates says that he is a constant reminder of the non-virtuous actions of his accusers.
The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle taught that people should live lives of moderation and balance based on reason. He believed in the concept of the "golden mean," which advocates for finding a middle ground between extremes in order to achieve virtuous living.