There are different ways in which people become subject to the law in their land. In some cases, such as the United States, the people adopted a form of government that allows elected officials to make law. Some legal systems have evolved from tribal leaders who prevailed in taking over a people and forming a government. Some legal systems are based on religious law that is enforced by the government. There are many variations in how law evolved in different parts of the world.
No. Not if a court has jurisdiction over her child.No. Not if a court has jurisdiction over her child.No. Not if a court has jurisdiction over her child.No. Not if a court has jurisdiction over her child.
At the family court that has jurisdiction over the case.At the family court that has jurisdiction over the case.At the family court that has jurisdiction over the case.At the family court that has jurisdiction over the case.
You need to contact the court with jurisdiction over the case for instructions.You need to contact the court with jurisdiction over the case for instructions.You need to contact the court with jurisdiction over the case for instructions.You need to contact the court with jurisdiction over the case for instructions.
When does a court have personal jurisdiction over a party to a lawsuit
US district courts have trial jurisdiction (aka original jurisdiction) over federal court cases.
Jurisdiction in personam (jurisdiction over the person)-This refers to the power of a court over the person of adefendant. The court may acquire such jurisdictionwhen someone commits a crime, or performs an actcausing injury to another within the court's jurisdictionalarea. By doing such acts, the person is said tohave consented to the court's jurisdiction.• Jurisdiction of the subject matter-This refers to thepower of the court to hear the type of case. Courts ofgeneral jurisdiction have subject matter jurisdiction overfelonies and cases of high value (commonly $25,000 ormore). Courts of limited jurisdiction (authorized to hearonly misdemeanors, for example) can't sit in judgmentin a murder case. They have no jurisdiction.
It depends on the court system. You need to inquire at the court that has jurisdiction over your case.It depends on the court system. You need to inquire at the court that has jurisdiction over your case.It depends on the court system. You need to inquire at the court that has jurisdiction over your case.It depends on the court system. You need to inquire at the court that has jurisdiction over your case.
You need to contact the court with jurisdiction over your case and inquire there.You need to contact the court with jurisdiction over your case and inquire there.You need to contact the court with jurisdiction over your case and inquire there.You need to contact the court with jurisdiction over your case and inquire there.
A federal court has jurisdiction over constitutional violations.
Any agreement must be filed at the court with jurisdiction over the case- the court that issued the order.Any agreement must be filed at the court with jurisdiction over the case- the court that issued the order.Any agreement must be filed at the court with jurisdiction over the case- the court that issued the order.Any agreement must be filed at the court with jurisdiction over the case- the court that issued the order.
No, they are completely different court systems. One has jurisdiction over state matters, the other over federal matters.
Concurrent jurisdiction is when more than one court has jurisdiction over a case. These means that they have jurisdiction over the same case at the same time.