If it is inefficient, causing more input then output, or wasteful, eg: a hydrogen converter with a reuptake adapter reusing purified hydrogen but losing the bulk of the material.
No
Washing machine converts electrical energy into kinetic energy. It helps in washing the clothes.
Losses of energy within the machine- some of the energy is used up by friction, and converted to heat. There is also the matter of efficency of a machine. The less efficent, the more power you must put in to get the same output.
No, that would be a violation of the laws of physics.
An energy feed is a food source that gives extra energy to those who eat it, allowing them to expend more energy when needed.
It would consume more fuel - as it would need to expend more energy to fight against the headwind.
yes it is but you expend energy trying to use it-planetary gravity that is-universal gravity might be more usable be we are talking zero point technology-you get what you give/cause effect/dont get nothin for free
The law of conservation of energy was never found to be violated. The relevance for a machine is that a machine can not produce more energy than is put into the machine.
If you are trying to lose weight, no you should expend more of your muscle energy. Otherwise, yes. Additional energy expenditures force us to burn fossil fuels.
You will burn more Calories the more energy you expend, So running will make you lose weight faster than walking and diet also plays a very impotant part, staying away from too much fats and sugar would help probably more and watching your Calorie intake.
By consuming more calories than we expend.
The lowest; all others expend it at some point, which makes it leave the pyramid/food chain. << The base (producers) because that is the level where energy is first fixed to the ecosystem. ALL levels expend more energy than they fix. >
No
No
Washing machine converts electrical energy into kinetic energy. It helps in washing the clothes.