Strange as it may seem - viruses don't eat. All they do (and do rather well) is inject their DNA (or RNA) into cells and let the cell do all the other necessities of life for them.
a virus
No. It is nonliving.
Viruses are nonliving. They hijacked the DNA of the host cell and make the host cell produce the proteins and other things they need. Since they are not living they do not need food.
at first i was crying but then it just hit me it was a stupied virus
No: Mumps is a virus, and by definition viruses are nonliving, neither dead or alive.
A virus is considered non-living. It does not have all the characteristics of a living thing unlike bacteria. Viruses need living cells to reproduce while any living things can reproduce (asexually or not).
Since viruses are nonliving, they are not given genus and species names. This virus is called the Ebola hemorrhagic virus (EHV).
The "Coral Kingdom" lives on land and absorbs its food from other living or nonliving things.
an oxymoron, maybe a virus, something that died
a food chain always starts with a producer. a nonliving thing
There is some debate about the status of a virus, whether it is living, not living, or some intermediary condition.
It is nonliving like all viruses and are not effected by sub zero temperatures.