Want this question answered?
It was in a way a religion, they made it to help understand the unknown.
hell... how am i supposed to no
Historians rely on artifacts, oral tradition and written records to answer questions about the past. Artifacts are materials left behind by cultures, oral traditions are stories that have survived through ancestry and written records can be non fiction or fiction.
Research into the source. Everyone has an axe to grind, an angle and a purpose. Each of these will colour the viewpoint as no one is truly objective. Once you understand what the motives of a source are you can examine it more clearly. For instance, a medieval writer trying to get noticed and seek advancement from the king will want to flatter and gloss over the negative and exaggerate the positive. They may want to make the king seem more intelligent, more courageous in battle, or more fearsome so any passages written about a battle would need to be verified to be trustworthy. If another, independent, source agrees with the sequence of events or sentiments expressed then it could be that the version is more trustworthy, as long as that second source isn't using the first as its basis or has the same set of motivations. For instance, we can know that the Battle of Hastings was fought at the place now called Battle as all sources, English and Norman agree. There also has been archaelogical evidence discovered to back it up. That will allow you to trust a the sources more. But where a source is the only one to attest something, then only examination of it can help.
i have no clue but im pretty shure if six graders neeed help me im gonna well we are gonna want the answer so any body
A primary source is a source from someone who was there. A diary, or letters from a soldier, for example, help us understand the war from his specific point of view.
Dictionaries
Dictionaries
key words in
By analyzing internal consistency within the source itself, such as language, writing style, and content. This can help determine if the source is likely to be from the claimed time period and author.
Historians will help us.
a Charleston Mercury editorial published in 1860
a Charleston Mercury editorial published in 1860
it helped historians understand egypt pasts because it told them how to understand hieroglyphics and other languages
by annilising what they used and their traditions................................................................................................................................... ..................................................... ........................................................................................... ....................................................... ............................................................................................................ ................................ .............................................................................................................................................. ............................................. ..........................................................................................................................
Primary source documents provide firsthand accounts and original evidence from the time period being studied, offering a direct window into the past. They can provide insight into the perspectives, beliefs, and experiences of people from that era, helping us to gain a more nuanced and authentic understanding of historical events. By analyzing primary sources, historians can uncover different interpretations, challenge existing narratives, and piece together a more accurate depiction of the past.
Words may have more than one meaning.