Want this question answered?
He compares the people of the Philippines to children who are governed without consent
He pointed out that the United States already does this with Native Americans. He also compared the people in the Philippines to children, who are governed without consent.
Consent of the governed matters because if the governed people do not consent to the governing body, they will revolt against it. It is also considered unjust to rule over people without their consent.
He pointed out that the United States already does this with Native Americans.
Consent of the governed matters because if the governed people do not consent to the governing body, they will revolt against it. It is also considered unjust to rule over people without their consent.
(apex) Answer: He says some people are not capable of self-government.
Beveridge said that some people were not capable of self-government.He pointed out that the US continues to do this with Native Americans, although they have their own local government powers.He points out that the United States already does this with Native Americans.He says that some people are not capable of self-government.He compares the with the people of the Philippines to children, who are governed without consent.
He says that some people are not capable of self-government and pointed out that the United States already does it with Native Americans.
John Locke thought no government can exist without the consent of the governed.
Yes it's essential in a democracy; without consent there'd be no authority.
the consent of the governed
No. That idea went out of the window in the aftermath of the fall of the Berlin wall.