Take the electron shuttle of the electron transfer chain in eukaryotes, cytochrome C. This highly conserved protein structure and its biochemical action is seen in many prokaryotes across many taxa and diverges in genetic instructions and form as would be expected in organisms of common ancestry.
In every way.
Fossils are not used to oppose the theory of evolution. They acutually support it in every way. So far not one fossil has been found that is not exactly where you would expect it to be if evolution were true. As we dig deeper we go further back in time and see by piecing fossils together how organisms evolved over time. Although we don't need fossils to support the fact that evolution is happening, it's a nice bonus to have in support of the theory.
Relative and absolute dating of the rocks and the fossils near it (geology and archaeology), as well as chemical components of various surrounding areas are consistent in explaining the diversity of life as explained by theory of evolution. Evolution is also consistent with embryology, genetics, comparative physiology, biochemistry, and more. See the related link below for more details.
The theory of evolution is that all living things come from other living things.
Proteins are made up of amino acids arranged in complicated patterns. Like the genomes that direct their synthesis, they follow a pattern of nested hierarchies, supporting common descent.
It is generally thought to support the Theory of Evolution.
The theory predicts that evolution will happen and in certain ways. The observed evolution makes this prediction correct. It also defines evolution as happening, and as such is perfect evidence in support of it.
I do not so much " believe it " as I an convinced by the myriad lines of converging evidences that support the theory of evolution by natural selection. talkorigins.org
In every way.
There is strong support for the theory of evolution due to fossils that have been found by archeologists. The fossil records show evidence of evolution over billions of years.
There is no proven theory of evolution only the physical evidence of what Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
evolution theory
The better question would be; what biological sciences DO NOT support Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection. Evolution is the backbone of biology and the theory that explains much about evolution is the bedrock on which all biology is built, regardless of the apparent absence in some disciplines of biology. It is no longer just Darwin's theory as many disciplines not formed then, and some extant then, have added to and refined the theory. Genetics Molecular cell biology. Evolutionary developmental biology. Biochemistry. Geology. Paleontology. Population generics. Botany. Evolutionary biology. And the list can go on. Google, disciplines in biology, wiki.
Fossils are not used to oppose the theory of evolution. They acutually support it in every way. So far not one fossil has been found that is not exactly where you would expect it to be if evolution were true. As we dig deeper we go further back in time and see by piecing fossils together how organisms evolved over time. Although we don't need fossils to support the fact that evolution is happening, it's a nice bonus to have in support of the theory.
Theory of evolution refers to animals and plants evolution along the time. Language evolution is another issue, not entirely related to the theory of evolution. It follows the theory of evolution on some way but it is related to culture evolution, not to the physical attributes evolution.
It shows when the animal that made a fossil was alive.
social darwinism