An observation is what you see. An inference is the conclusion you draw from what you saw.
A common analogy;
You may be doing a chemistry experiment and when you put two substances together, the mixture bubbles and brown gas comes off. You know that brown gas indicates nitrogen dioxide gas.
The observation would be "Mixture bubbles and brown gas is given off"
The inference would be "A gas is produced, nitrogen dioxide"
Observations are things you use your "five senses" to determine - how something smells, looks, tastes, sounds, or feels.
I think An observation about that inference is about that object.
An observation is the changes you see in your experiment. An inference is like drawing a conclusion, I guess...
how does a theory differ from an inference
They differ from observations because observations andbinfwrencw are bomb get it?
state why an observation cannot be an inference
state why an observation cannot be an inference
observation is observation! :)inference is inference! :)Assuming you meant "Differentiate observation from inference ?" !....Observation is the act of being able to physically see an object - inference is implying something is real without physical proof of its existence.Incidentally - why was this put into the category 'animal life' !
inference
Inference is a logical interpretation. Observation is using your senses.
Inference is a logical interpretation. Observation is using your senses.
inference
An observation is something you have SEEN, an inference is a logical conclusion drawn to EXPLAIN something you have seen/noticed..