Firstly, there would need to be some sort of quantifiable proof in regards to the violence, and show that this puts the children in harms way. That being said, all parents have rights to their children, the amount of rights ordered by the court is going to depend on things such as status quo.
Not living with one's children does not take away their rights to visitation.
In America, a man will win custody of children when it is shown that the woman is somehow incompetent, a drug user, or violent. It does happen even though it might not seem that frequent.
Research has shown that violence on TV teaches a child to react in violent ways. Children were shown violent cartoons and a set of children weren’t shown violent cartoons. The behavior on the playground of children watching violent cartoons were more violent with other children compared to the set of children who didn’t watch violent cartoons. The violence in TV, movies, games, and video breaks down the psychological barriers of hurting others.
Research has shown that violence on TV teaches a child to react in violent ways. Children were shown violent cartoons and a set of children weren’t shown violent cartoons. The behavior on the playground of children watching violent cartoons were more violent with other children compared to the set of children who didn’t watch violent cartoons. The violence in TV, movies, games, and video breaks down the psychological barriers of hurting others.
I think what you're saying is that there is no court order in place. If that is the case, then neither parent has legal custody, so who ever has the children then has custody. So, if the children were to return to the mothers care, or if the mother were to obtain the children she would then have custody. This is the case in North Carolina. I can't speak to other states. However, I would like to issue a warning. It is in the best interest of the children for the parents to come to an agreement about the custody of the children. Parents who are separated should still work together to ensure the well-being a safety of their children. If the mother is a drug user, has a violent boyfriend, or anything else that might put children at risk, then be warned that if the mother does remove the children from the father unwillingly - it is likely that he will make a report to Child Protective Services. If CPS finds out that the mother is an unsafe caregiver, it is likely the department will place the children with the father and give him full custody - with a court order.
YES
Yes! * Perhaps, if the incidents have been documented by authorities. Regardless it should be brought to the attention of the court if and only if it is a valid accusation.
No. Only within limits and under parent supervision. Research has shown that violence on TV teaches a child to react in violent ways. Children were shown violent cartoons and a set of children weren’t shown violent cartoons. The behavior on the playground of children watching violent cartoons were more violent with other children compared to the set of children who didn’t watch violent cartoons. The violence in TV, movies, games, and video breaks down the psychological barriers of hurting others.
He can sue to modify the existing custody arrangement. What happens after that is up to the court. It's certainly possible that he could.
The controversy after the Indira and Feroze Gandhi marriage was that her parents did not want them to be married. They had a very domestic violent relationship but did have two children together.
Martial arts is a violent past time and children should not practice it.
Only THEY can answer that truthfully ! If you're in a violent relationship - and you're unhappy... seek help NOW to get out !
1.not able to earn or stand on his own. 2.love and concern for the abuser. 3.children and their future.