Jem knows Tom has been convicted because the jury does not look at him. From prior experience, Jem knows that a jury never looks at someone they have convicted.
Jem realizes the jury has convicted Tom Robinson before the verdict is read based on the jury's expressions and body language. He notices that the jury members look uneasy and avoid making eye contact with Tom or his lawyer, suggesting they have already made up their minds about the verdict.
Unless the confession is to a crime that the jury does not think should be a crime, then they will return a verdict of "guilty". If they actually do dislike the law, they'll return a verdict of "not guilty", even though they know he/she technically is guilty.
If you have been convicted of a crime, you have pleaded or been found you guilty by a judge or jury. You can go to the courthouse where you were convicted and ask for a copy of your judgment.
Scout noticed that the African American spectators in the balcony stood up as a sign of respect for Atticus when the jury was leaving the courtroom to deliberate. This act of solidarity indicated to Scout that the verdict was already decided against Tom Robinson.
If a lot of people focus on one thing they can accomplish great thingsThey are similar because for both, Scout and Jem are waiting and do not know what will happen.She looks back remembering her dad (Atticus) shooting the sick dog.
Scout knew about the verdict before she heard it because she observed the jury's body language and realized they were looking guilty before the official announcement was made. Additionally, the way Atticus carried himself after the verdict was another clue that it was not in their favor.
The judge hears the accusers side of the story - the accused is granted the opportunity to give their side of the story - the judge renders the decision (or in the case of a jury trial - the jury renders the decision). Either way - you'll know.
I think you would have to go before a judge and state your case why you should be dismissed. I was asked to be on my local grand jury and had an interview with a judge before hand and I know you sign on for 2 years to be on the jury. I don't think they will let you off with a flimsy excuse.
You should not just ignore the jury-duty summons, call the court and let them know of your situation.
When Scout says that Jem is "counting his chickens," she means that he is assuming something will happen in the future without considering potential obstacles or uncertainties. It's like counting your chickens before they hatch, assuming the outcome before it actually occurs.
I think we all know what happened, but the jury has reached its verdict and that's that. She cannot be re-tried on the same charges.
The grand jury has chosen not to indict the Defendant on the charges presented before them.
Never heard of this happening, but I do not believe that it oculd the way you describe. Once the verdict is announced from the bench - THAT is IT! They would have to re-open the trial, or have a whole other hearing before they could just change the delivered verdict. Would need to know more about the circumstances in order to comment further.