Assuming the input side of the lever remains the same length, the reduction in distance you specify will reduce the input effort needed.
If the input and output lengths from the fulcrum are respectively L and l (small 'L') long, and the input and output forces are respectivelyf and F, then
Lf = lF
So to maintain that algebraicequality, reducing l will increase F for the same values of L and f.
A microscope should not be focused by moving the objectives and the slide closer together because it will affect the working distance. It is the optimal distance between objective lens and the upper surface of the slide.
Not at all! A big part of what makes levers so useful is the ability to dodifferent things with them by moving the fulcrum either closer to the effortor closer to the load.The first example that pops into my mind is: A 200-lb father doing the see-sawwith his 6-year-old daughter. To get anything out of that experience, they needthe fulcrum much closer to Dad.And by the way ... with a Second Class or Third Class lever, it's not evenpossible to make those distances the same, since the effort and the loadare both on the same side of the fulcrum.
Moving the fulcrum on a lever will effect it by making it easier or harder to move the load. A lever is defined as a simple machine that consists of the fulcrum and a rigid bar.
That's actually only possible in a First Class lever. In that case, moving the fulcrum closer to the load makes it easier to lift the load, since it now takes less force at the effort end. But the effort force also has to move through a greater distance than it did before, in order to lift the load to the same height.
how does moving a fulcrum on a lever change the amount of force needed to move an object
A microscope should not be focused by moving the objectives and the slide closer together because it will affect the working distance. It is the optimal distance between objective lens and the upper surface of the slide.
There can be a moving fulcrum but it will not be a very good lever
Not at all! A big part of what makes levers so useful is the ability to dodifferent things with them by moving the fulcrum either closer to the effortor closer to the load.The first example that pops into my mind is: A 200-lb father doing the see-sawwith his 6-year-old daughter. To get anything out of that experience, they needthe fulcrum much closer to Dad.And by the way ... with a Second Class or Third Class lever, it's not evenpossible to make those distances the same, since the effort and the loadare both on the same side of the fulcrum.
Moving the fulcrum on a lever will effect it by making it easier or harder to move the load. A lever is defined as a simple machine that consists of the fulcrum and a rigid bar.
That's actually only possible in a First Class lever. In that case, moving the fulcrum closer to the load makes it easier to lift the load, since it now takes less force at the effort end. But the effort force also has to move through a greater distance than it did before, in order to lift the load to the same height.
how does moving a fulcrum on a lever change the amount of force needed to move an object
The magnitude of the effort is controlled by you, not by the distance of the load from the fulcrum. Moving the load farther away from the fulcrum has no effect on the effort. But if you want to leave the effort where it is and still lift the load with the lever, then you're going to have to increase the effort.
It depends upon where the fulcrum is, and it can be changed by moving the fulcrum.
It depends upon where the fulcrum is, and it can be changed by moving the fulcrum.
It depends upon where the fulcrum is, and it can be changed by moving the fulcrum.
because you get momentum and tou're moving faster.
It is when a lever turns in moving a body.