0
It lowers it slightly, just as it would with water (since diet pepsi and all soda/pop is almost all water).
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When was EPSI created?
EPSI was created in 1961.
What are some eight letter words with 2nd letter E and 3rd letter P and 4th letter S and 5th letter I?
According to SOWPODS (the combination of Scrabble dictionaries used around the world) there are 2 words with the pattern -EPSI---. That is, eight letter words with 2nd letter E and 3rd letter P and 4th letter S and 5th letter I. In alphabetical order, they are: depsides pepsines
What are some six letter words with 2nd letter E and 3rd letter P and 4th letter S and 5th letter I?
According to SOWPODS (the combination of Scrabble dictionaries used around the world) there are 2 words with the pattern -EPSI-. That is, six letter words with 2nd letter E and 3rd letter P and 4th letter S and 5th letter I. In alphabetical order, they are: pepsin sepsis
how long had fgteev mommy and duddy been together?
suggest that a PSR can develop without a PSI occurring, such as when the characters do not make a direct connection with the viewer. In sum, the terms, definitions, and models explicating PSI and PSR differ across scientific backgrounds and traditions. For example, Dibble et al. (2016) argued that PSI and PSR are often "conflated conceptually and methodologically" (p. 21). To test their assertion, they tested for parasocial indicators with two different scales used for parasocial inquiry: the traditional PSI-Scale (Rubin et al., 1985) and the newer EPSI-Scale (Hartmann & Goldhoorn, 2011), and compared results between the two. The traditional PSI-Scale, along with modified forms of it, is the most widely used measure of PSI assessment. However, Dibble et al. (2016) found evidence supporting their hypothesis that the newer EPSI-Scale was a better measure of PSIs and that the traditional scale merely revealed participants' liking of characters. Because of varying conceptions, it is difficult for researchers to reach a consensus. Studying social interaction, and by extension parasocial interaction (PSI), follows a social cognitive approach to defining individual cognitive activity. Accordingly, there are similar psychological processes at work in both parasocial relationships and face-to-face interactions. However, the parasocial relationship does not follow the process of the typical long-term relationship. The media user remains a stranger to the media figure, whereas this "strangeness" would gradually evaporate in typical social interaction. Many parasocial relationships fulfill the needs of typical social interaction, but potentially reward insecurity. Many who possess a dismissive attachment style to others may find the one-sided interaction to be preferable in lieu of dealing with others, while those who experience anxiety from typical interactions may find comfort in the lives of celebrities consistently being present. Additionally, whatever a celebrity or online figure may do can provoke emotional responses from their audiences—some even going as far as suffering from negative feelings because of it. The research of PSI obtained significant interest after the advent of the uses and gratifications approach to mass communication research in the early 1970s. In a study of early soap opera, McQuail et al. (1972) identified two essential functions of PSI: companionship and personal identity. Rosengren and Windahl (1972) further argued that PSI could be identified in the process of viewers' interacting with media figures, but such interaction did not produce identification. This is an important distinction, because identification has a longer history than PSI. Subsequent research has indicated that PSI is evident when identification is not present (Chory-Assad & Yanen, 2005; de Bruin, Suijkerbujk, & Jansz, 2006). During last several decades
