ok :) first challenge of natural environment theory is .. a HMMMP / . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .DI KO ALAM EH
Beuly Suhr was one of the first people to challenge her theory because she's a badass and she can eat bananas while doing a hand stand
What was the catastrophism theory? Who was one of the first people to challenge this viewpoint and what did he say about it?
According to Quantum Physics - all things don't have a cause. However, you should look at the Cosmological Argument (also known as the First Cause Argument) if you looking on the philosophical side: http:/www.existence-of-god.com/first-cause-argument.html
Nicholaus Copernicus was one of the first to challenge the theory that the earth was the center of the universe. He made up the Heliocentric theory.
Cosmological theory is a scientific theory . (It should be noted that a scientific theory differs greatly from common notions of what a theory is) . A cosmological theory takes scientific facts, raw data, evidence & logical argumentation & organizes it as an explanation of the cosmos ... The "argument" is purely philosophical in nature. It's origins are widely attributed a Muslim named Kalam in the Middle Ages. It sought to use the workings of the cosmos as a proof for the existence of a god. It positions a god as a kind of "first mover". However; the argument is weak & has been refuted on many levels. It's based on a misunderstanding of "cause & effect".
Thomas Aquinas's believed that there had to be a God because he thought that everything had a cause and the cause for the Universe is God. God had to be the first cause.
Some interpretations of the Bible creation story could be seen as supporting the first cause argument, as it describes God as the ultimate cause of all creation. However, not all religious interpretations equate to the philosophical concept of the first cause argument as articulated by thinkers like Aquinas or Aristotle.
The theory come first because without a theory there is nothing to make a law.
Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace were the first to formulate a scientific argument for the theory of evolution by means of natural selection
Prima Causa is a Latin term. Prima meaning "first." Causa meaning "cause, or event." Prima Causa then means "first cause."
Both are arguments for the existence of god. They are both similar. The teleological argument, or argument from design posits that there is a god or designer based on the appearance of complexity, order, and design in nature. The argument is usually structured as follows: 1) Complexity implies a designer. 2) The universe is highly complex. 3) Therefore, the universe must have a designer. The cosmological argument, or first cause argument states that god must exist as a first cause to the universe. It is usually structured as follows: 1) Whatever exists has a cause. 2) The universe exists. 3) Therefore the universe had a cause.