answersLogoWhite

0

Thomas Aquinas's believed that there had to be a God because he thought that everything had a cause and the cause for the Universe is God. God had to be the first cause.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What distinction does Hick draw on to defend Thomas Aquinas' first-cause argument?

Between a regress of events and a regress of explanations


How does the cosmological argument work?

The cosmological argument is a philosophical argument that attempts to prove the existence of God by showing that the universe could not have originated from nothing and must have a cause or explanation. It states that every contingent being has a cause, and since an infinite regress of causes is not possible, there must be a first cause (God) to explain the existence of the universe. It is often associated with philosophers like Thomas Aquinas and William Lane Craig.


What are the five ways of reason?

The five ways of reason are the arguments of motion, causes, possibility, degress of perfection, and governance. These arguments were made by St. Thomas Aquanis which proposed that the existence of God can be demonstrated through reason.


Who made cosmological argument?

The cosmological argument is not so much an argument itself as a style of argumentation concerning the theoretical necessity for a first member for any series dependent upon time. It was put forth by Aristotle as an argument for a Prime Mover in book 12 of his Metaphysics. The argument itself, however, may be older than Aristotle. St. Thomas Aquinas later popularized it as an argument for the existence of God which, though it does not prove the being of a benevolent and intelligent creator, comes as close to proving God's existence as Aquinas thought secular reasoning to be capable.


How did Thomas Aquinas attempt to explain the differences between Aristotle and the Church's teachings?

"One of the arguments put forth by Aquinas is called the First Cause argument: every effect has a cause, the universe is an effect, therefore the universe has a cause, and that cause is God. For Aquinas, God alone didn't have a beginning. Therefore, for Aquinas, the question what caused God was not relevant. And Aquinas' idea of cause was not complicated as it would be in the 20th century with the arrival of quantum physics."This is a quote from the website macrohistory it should answer your question (SKS)


Where are St Thomas' five proofs of the existence of God?

St Thomas Aquinas relied on what is known as the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God. He claimed that there were five valid ways to prove God exists, although thre of them are essentially restatements of the same things. Essentially his view was that some contingent beings exist; contingent beings require a noncontingent ground of being (a "necessary thing") in order to exist; therefore a noncontingent ground of being exists. This is not a great deal different to the Ontological Argument. Aquinas' theological positions involved making unprovable assumptions from which to prove the unprovable.


Does the Bible creation story support the first cause argument?

The 'First Cause Argument' is based on the biblical creation story, so it would be false logic and a circular argument then to use the creation story to support the First Cause Argument.For more information on the Bible creation story, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation


Why do people disagree with the cosmological argument?

A:The Cosmological Argument forthe existence of God was stated by St Thomas Aquinas, although he did not claim to be the first to use the Argument. Reduced to its simplest possible form, it can be stated as: Some contingent beings existContingent beings require a non-contingent ground of being in order to existTherefore a non-contingent ground of being exists. For Aquinas, this can only be God.Theists hold that everything (contingent beings) must have a creator (the "first cause"), but the creator (non-contingent ground of being) does not require to be created.An argument against the Cosmological Argument says that it has three serious defects:the first premise (Some contingent beings exist) is either unintelligible or is a truism. If it is unintelligible, it is not deserving of serious consideration. If it is a truism, nothing of importance follows from it.It does not help the argument to decide on God as a "first cause", because it is at least as easy to regard the existence of being as uncaused.The conclusion of the argument is so ambiguous that it seems quite impossible either to affirm or deny it.Even if we accept the Cosmological Argument, the non-contingent ground of being does not have to be a deity - we can think of it as the Big Bang. If it is a deity, then it does not have to be the Abrahamic God - we can think of it as Brahma, Ahura Mazda or any other creator god.


Who was the first patron saint of Catholic schools?

The patron saints of Catholic schools are St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Ursula.


Why did aquinas refute the big bang theory?

Thomas Aquinas was entirely unaware of the big bang hypothesis. Aquinas was a 13th century Sicilian monk, while the big bang concept was first developed in the early 1960s. So, he would not have been able to refute it.


What is the cosmological argument?

The basic Platonic/Aristotelian cosmological argument is this:Every finite and contingent being has a cause.A causal loop cannot exist.A causal chain cannot be of infinite length.Therefore, a First Cause (or something that is not an effect) must exist. God is then often inserted as this "First Cause".The newer more often quoted Kalam cosmological argument is this:(1)Everything that has a beginning of its existence has a cause of its existence.(2)The universe has a beginning of its existence. Therefore:(3) The universe has a cause of its existence.(4) If the universe has a cause of its existence then that cause is God. Therefore:(5) God exists.The Kalam cosmological argument is the one most often used in contemporary debate by apologists such as Dr. William Lane Craig.


What was the name of the mother of Saint Thomas Aquinas?

Thomas' mother, Theodora, belonged to the Rossi branch of the Neapolitan Caracciolo family.