0
An action at a distance is a term used to describe how masses attract when they are held at a certain distance. If one of these objects is charged is creates an electric field that can be felt by all other masses within a certain distance.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How does the concept of a field eliminate the idea action at a distance?
It doesn't cause you can still get artillery and such *Um somehow I don't think they mean in a battle field :P I would assume that you are talking about physics? In which case the answer would be that the concept of a field eliminates the idea of action at a distance because the objects are thought to be in constant contact with the field.
How does the concept of a field eliminate the idea of a action at a distance?
there is no contact between th objects,and the forces are acting at a distance putting this in terms of the field concept, we can say that the orbiting satellite and electron interact with the force fields of the object.
Can gravitational be added to electric field to get the total field?
No. The sum of the gravitational field and the electric field is a useless concept.
What is the field strength at a distance one Earth radius beyond the surface?
I assume you mean, of the gravitational field? The gravitational field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. At a distance of 1 Earth radius, the distance from the center of the Earth is twice the distance at the Earth's surface; thus, the field strength is 1/4 what it is on the surface. If at the surface the field strength is about 9.8 meters per second square, divide that by 4 to get the field strength at a distance of one Earth radius from the surface.I assume you mean, of the gravitational field? The gravitational field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. At a distance of 1 Earth radius, the distance from the center of the Earth is twice the distance at the Earth's surface; thus, the field strength is 1/4 what it is on the surface. If at the surface the field strength is about 9.8 meters per second square, divide that by 4 to get the field strength at a distance of one Earth radius from the surface.I assume you mean, of the gravitational field? The gravitational field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. At a distance of 1 Earth radius, the distance from the center of the Earth is twice the distance at the Earth's surface; thus, the field strength is 1/4 what it is on the surface. If at the surface the field strength is about 9.8 meters per second square, divide that by 4 to get the field strength at a distance of one Earth radius from the surface.I assume you mean, of the gravitational field? The gravitational field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. At a distance of 1 Earth radius, the distance from the center of the Earth is twice the distance at the Earth's surface; thus, the field strength is 1/4 what it is on the surface. If at the surface the field strength is about 9.8 meters per second square, divide that by 4 to get the field strength at a distance of one Earth radius from the surface.
Why can magnets attract objects without touching them?
Magnets have a magnetic field about them. This field can act on objects without the magnet coming in contact with the object.
How does the concept of a field eliminate the idea action at a distance?
It doesn't cause you can still get artillery and such *Um somehow I don't think they mean in a battle field :P I would assume that you are talking about physics? In which case the answer would be that the concept of a field eliminates the idea of action at a distance because the objects are thought to be in constant contact with the field.
How does the concept of a field eliminate the idea of action at a distance?
It doesn't cause you can still get artillery and such *Um somehow I don't think they mean in a battle field :P I would assume that you are talking about physics? In which case the answer would be that the concept of a field eliminates the idea of action at a distance because the objects are thought to be in constant contact with the field.
How does the concept of a field eliminate the idea of a action at a distance?
there is no contact between th objects,and the forces are acting at a distance putting this in terms of the field concept, we can say that the orbiting satellite and electron interact with the force fields of the object.
Does quantum physics explain the concept of omnipresence?
I'm pretty sure it doesn't, and my knowledge on the subject is pretty vast. I think you should consider the field of theology for your question.
How do you explain the term broard field curriculum?
explain the term broard field curriculum
What is meant by electric field intencity?
An electric field can be represented diagrammatically as a set of lines with arrows on, called electric field-lines, which fill space. Electric field-lines are drawn according to the following rules: The direction of the electric field is everywhere tangent to the field-lines, in the sense of the arrows on the lines. The magnitude of the field is proportional to the number of field-lines per unit area passing through a small surface normal to the lines. Thus, field-lines determine the magnitude, as well as the direction, of the electric field. In particular, the field is strong at points where the field-lines are closely spaced, and weak at points where they are far apart. Electric Field intensity It was stated that the electric field concept arose in an effort to explain action-at-a-distance forces. All charged objects create an electric field which extends outward into the space which surrounds it. The charge alters that space, causing any other charged object that enters the space to be affected by this field. The strength of the electric field is dependent upon how charged the object creating the field is and upon the distance of separation from the charged object. In this section of Lesson 4, we will investigate electric field from a numerical viewpoint - the electric field strength. An electric field can be represented diagrammatically as a set of lines with arrows on, called electric field-lines, which fill space. Electric field-lines are drawn according to the following rules: The direction of the electric field is everywhere tangent to the field-lines, in the sense of the arrows on the lines. The magnitude of the field is proportional to the number of field-lines per unit area passing through a small surface normal to the lines. Thus, field-lines determine the magnitude, as well as the direction, of the electric field. In particular, the field is strong at points where the field-lines are closely spaced, and weak at points where they are far apart. Electric Field intensity It was stated that the electric field concept arose in an effort to explain action-at-a-distance forces. All charged objects create an electric field which extends outward into the space which surrounds it. The charge alters that space, causing any other charged object that enters the space to be affected by this field. The strength of the electric field is dependent upon how charged the object creating the field is and upon the distance of separation from the charged object. In this section of Lesson 4, we will investigate electric field from a numerical viewpoint - the electric field strength.
Can gravitational be added to electric field to get the total field?
No. The sum of the gravitational field and the electric field is a useless concept.
What is the field strength at a distance one Earth radius beyond the surface?
I assume you mean, of the gravitational field? The gravitational field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. At a distance of 1 Earth radius, the distance from the center of the Earth is twice the distance at the Earth's surface; thus, the field strength is 1/4 what it is on the surface. If at the surface the field strength is about 9.8 meters per second square, divide that by 4 to get the field strength at a distance of one Earth radius from the surface.I assume you mean, of the gravitational field? The gravitational field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. At a distance of 1 Earth radius, the distance from the center of the Earth is twice the distance at the Earth's surface; thus, the field strength is 1/4 what it is on the surface. If at the surface the field strength is about 9.8 meters per second square, divide that by 4 to get the field strength at a distance of one Earth radius from the surface.I assume you mean, of the gravitational field? The gravitational field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. At a distance of 1 Earth radius, the distance from the center of the Earth is twice the distance at the Earth's surface; thus, the field strength is 1/4 what it is on the surface. If at the surface the field strength is about 9.8 meters per second square, divide that by 4 to get the field strength at a distance of one Earth radius from the surface.I assume you mean, of the gravitational field? The gravitational field is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. At a distance of 1 Earth radius, the distance from the center of the Earth is twice the distance at the Earth's surface; thus, the field strength is 1/4 what it is on the surface. If at the surface the field strength is about 9.8 meters per second square, divide that by 4 to get the field strength at a distance of one Earth radius from the surface.
Explain Soil stabilisers test and field control?
Explain Soil
What is a perimeter of a farmers field?
The perimeter is always the distance around the outside edge (of the field). However this will vary according to the size of the field; it is not a standardised distance.
Why can magnets attract objects without touching them?
Magnets have a magnetic field about them. This field can act on objects without the magnet coming in contact with the object.
Do they include the endzone in measuring the distance of a field goal in football?
Yes. The endzone is included in the distance of a field goal.
