The Constitution limits the president's power based on checks and balance.
It is when Congress may law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the court of law, or in the heads of departments.
The Constitution limits the president's power based on checks and balance.
The Constitution limits the president's power based on checks and balance.
Because the Senate must ratify treaties with a super majority.
To limit the presidents power
The Constitution.
No. Treaties have to be ratified by the Senate. The second Amendment to the US Constitution requires "the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed". Congress has no power to limit the right to bear arms through laws or treaties.
The constitution sets boundaries to limit what the government can & cannot do.
I don't know what "three exclusive powers" you are referring to. Congress (the Legislative Branch) by wording proposed legislation which eventually may become law, can LIMIT the exercise of control of the Executive Branch (which is the branch charged with carrying out the laws), and by re-wording laws which the Supreme Court (Judicial Branch) considers can alter the law and bring it into conformity with the Constitution.^*By Having these three, As in 1. appointments 2. Impeachment 3. treaties (At least that what I put.)*The Senate's powers allow it to limit the power of the House. They can confirm appointments of Cabinet secretaries, federal judges, other federal executive officials, military officers & other federal uniformed officers.
The President can not declare war on another countries. The only limitation on the President's treaty power is his ability to get the 3/4 of the Senate to ratify his Treaty. A more interesting question is if the President and Senate create and ratify a Treaty that conflicts with the Constitution. The Supreme Court is the branch that would have to decide what takes precedent. An example would be where the Constitution has the Supreme Court as the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution yet the President and Senate approve a Treaty making the International Court the ultimate arbiter on international issues.
The Confederate constitution is said to have one reasonable feature concerning the term limit of Confederate presidents. The term of any Confederate president was six years with no chance for a reelection. This idea does have merit. Unlike today, where US presidents have to devote time & money on campaigning for a second term, the Confederate president has no such obligation. One flaw of the current two term limit in the US constitution is this. On the pretext of of making political speeches around the country and explaining current and future policies, a president uses tax payer dollars to promote themselves and their future policies if reelected.
When FDR served, the Constitution did not limit the number of terms a president could serve. George Washington set the precedent of two terms and presidents had followed it until FDR. After him an amendment to the Constitution was ratified that limits a president to two terms
Constitution
Yes, there is a two-term limit on the President of the United States. This was made possible by the 22nd Amendment to the Federal Constitution ratified in 1951.