Want this question answered?
Bill of Rights protects the individual rights.Bill of rights protects the individual rights.
The preamble has nothing to do with individual rights. It only states the purpose of the constitution. It is the Bill of Rights that protects individual rights.
The bill of rights is intended to protect individual freedoms and their rights.
Individual Rights are generally understood to mean the rights to life, liberty, property and voluntary contractual exchange. Individual rights traditionally encompass not only the right to control ones own life, liberty and property, but also to defend those rights.
Bill of Rights
separation of powers,independence of judiciary,recognition and protection of individual rights and freedom,institutions that support democracy,control of amendment of the constitution,review of the constitutionality of the law
It is unconstitutional for a police officer to formally question a person before reading them their rights.
To preserve and protect the constitution and community by enforcing the law and protecting an individual's constitutionally protected rights.
All of them. If you want to be more specific, the first amendment protects the individual's right to freedom of speech, religion, and to question the government's authority by petitioning and assembling peaceful protests. The second amendment protects the individual's right to own weapons. The fourth amendment protects the individual's right to privacy. Read the Bill of Rights, my friend. It's all there.
Bill of Rights protects the individual rights.Bill of rights protects the individual rights.
Is the struggle of liberalism and constitutionalism justifiable?why?
Is the struggle of liberalism and constitutionalism justifiable?why?
Liberal Constitutionalism include several philosophies that consider liberty their highest political outcome. These are the protections that are deliberately set in place to guard against tyranny. They include a system of checks and balances, separation of power, civil liberties and rights.
Outside the Bill of Rights, and just generally speaking, Constitutional amendments don't preserve individual rights. Two amendments specifically limit individual rights, one for the better (abolishing slavery) and the other out of a sense of moral superiority (Prohibition). The first 10 amendments, which not all preserve individual rights, are called the Bill of Rights because they outline "freedoms" that were not in written into the Constitution. By allowing for an amendment system, the founders allowed the Constitution to change as needed. In many ways, amendments are just a further specification of something already in the Constitution or redefining something ambiguous. An amendment exists, for instance, to limit the term a President can serve (to two); amendments exist that extend the right to vote to the former slaves and to women. Proposals to amend the Constitution to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman would not preserve individual rights but rather take them away (like Prohibition for alcoholic beverages, and very much like the feeling of moral superiority the same authors of Prohibition had). ----------------- Amendments often clarify specifically something that may or may not have been evident in the document before the amendment. The slavery amendments and the women sufferage clarify and remove any doubt that the document means that all people can vote . The Constitution said "We the people", there has been some debate over the years as to who "the people are". So an amendment can "preserve individual rights". Amendments are often enacted to clarify and remove any doubt about a question. For example, do disabled folks have the same rights as healthy people.
Constitutionalism
Everyone no matter who you are must abide by the rules of the constitution.
Constitutionalism sets checks and balances on Power, limits the exercise of executive powers, Guarantees the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens, and prohibits any Legislation not consistent with Constitutional Rights. Absolutism sets no limits on the exercise of Authoritarian Power, and provides no Constitutional Guarantees of Rights and Freedoms.