0
J.J. thomson's model doesn't have an electrons flowing around like how are planets orbit the sun. The current model has these things.
What else can I help you with?
How does the current model of the atom differ from j.j Thomsons model?
J.J. thomson's model doesn't have an electrons flowing around like how are planets orbit the sun. The current model has these things.
How does the current model of the atom differ from j.j. Thomsons model?
J.J. thomson's model doesn't have an electrons flowing around like how are planets orbit the sun. The current model has these things.
What was JJ Thomsons model of the atom called?
JJ Thomson's model of the atom is called the "plum pudding model." It suggested that atoms were made up of positive and negative charges distributed throughout a neutral, positively-charged background.
How is Tho masons model different from Daltons?
Thomsons model (plum pudding model of negatively charged particles in a positive soup) differed from Daltons model. Dalton hypothesised that atoms were indivisible, the word atom comes from the Greek atomos cannot be cut)
How did Rutherfords model of the atom different from thomsons?
The Rutherford model involve a positive nucleus separated from electrons.
How does the current model of the atom differ from j.j Thomson's model?
J.J. thomson's model doesn't have an electrons flowing around like how are planets orbit the sun. The current model has these things.
How does the current model of the atom differ from J.J Thomson model?
J.J. thomson's model doesn't have an electrons flowing around like how are planets orbit the sun. The current model has these things.
How did thomsons experiment change daltons atomic model?
Thomson's experiment showed that atoms contain subatomic particles, specifically electrons. This discovery led to the modification of Dalton's atomic model, which previously considered atoms to be indivisible and uniform. Thomson's model proposed the existence of electrons within the atom.
How did thomsons atomic model differ from daltons model?
If i remember correctly, Dalton's focuses more on the nucleus while Thompson's focuses more on electrons. But I'm not sure. well in 1803 John Dalton makes a strong case that atoms are small, solid balls and Joeseph John Thompson discovers electrons, and developed plum pudding model of an atom..... Dalton says that nothings smaller than the atom, but Thompson says that electrons are.
How did Rutherford's model of the atom differ from Thompson?
Thomsons model is sometimes called the plum pudding model as he envisaged a soup of positive charge with negative charges, by then already called electrons swimming round. He came up with this idea in 1904."the atoms of the elements consist of a number of negatively electrified corpuscles enclosed in a sphere of uniform positive electrification"Rutherford following on from the famous scattering experiment with gold foil and alpha particles proposed that the positive charge was concentrated in a central nucleus.
How does the current model of the atom differ fromj.j. Thomson's model?
The current model of the atom, known as the quantum mechanical model, differs significantly from J.J. Thomson's "plum pudding" model. While Thomson proposed that atoms are composed of a positively charged "soup" with negatively charged electrons embedded throughout, the quantum mechanical model describes electrons as existing in probabilistic orbitals around a dense nucleus, rather than fixed positions. Additionally, the current model incorporates principles of quantum mechanics, emphasizing wave-particle duality and the uncertainty principle, which were not present in Thomson's earlier concept.
How did Thompson's model differ from Daltons model?
Thompson's model proposed that atoms were made up of positive and negative charges distributed throughout a positively charged sphere, similar to a raisin pudding. In contrast, Dalton's model suggested that atoms were indivisible and uniform spheres with no internal structure. Thompson's model introduced the idea of subatomic particles, while Dalton's model viewed atoms as simple building blocks of matter.
