0
How does the power of a pharaoh differ from that of a constitutional monarch like Queen Elizabeth?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Just go to this question in answer.com "The pharaoh of ancient Egypt was an absolute monarch how does the power of such a ruler differ from that of a constitutional monarch like Queen Elizabeth of Great Britain? "
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The pharaoh of aincient Egypt was an absolute monarch how does the power of such a ruler differ from that of a constitutianal monarch like Queen Elizabeth of great Britain?
the power of such a ruler differ from that of a Constitutional monarch like queen Elizabeth of great Britain for example a ruler from Egypt called a Pharaoh rules the country and give them punishments. but the queen in Egypt didn't do anything. Queen Elizabeth rules the country/state and don't give them punishments. in Egypt they give them cruel punishments vs queen Elizabeth don't give cruel punishments they didn't have rules in Egypt until they picked a Pharaoh and they made a code of Hammurabi.
How does the pharaoh differ from Queen Elizabeth?
A pharaoh , the king of Egypt , is different from the Queen of Great Britian , Elizabeth , because the pharaoh was also considered a "god" unlike Queen Elizabeth .
How does the power of an absolute ruler like the Pharaoh of Ancient Egypt differ from that of a constitutional monarch like Queen Elizabeth of Great Brittan?
An absolute ruler has the ability to create, sign off on, and enforce any rule, law, edict, or judgment that he desires. He is not required to listen to anyone's opinion, though he may solicit it and he is not required to follow any laws himself. A constitutional monarch is bound by a constitution, restricting his power as concerns his abilities to create, sign off on, and enforce rules, laws, edicts, and judgments. In the case of Queen Elizabeth I, she had no power to create laws and rules and could only issue edicts or sign off on laws or rules given to her by the legislature. Additionally, because the judiciary was a separate branch she had no direct authority over judgments. The most important difference between a constitutional monarch and an absolute monarch is that the constitutional monarch is bound by the law and can be held accountable for his actions; the absolute monarch is above the law.
How do absolute monarchs differ from constitutional monarch in their ability to use power?
the power of absolute monarchs is unlimited
How does monarchy differ from oligarchy?
A Monarchy has a Monarch or a single ruler ( Or in the case of a Constitutional Monarchy, a Monarch as a sort of figurehead) while Oligarchy involves a snall and elite cadre of people who control most of the wealth of a country. (Russia is a good present example.)
How did the Canadian government differ from the American Government?
Canada - America Constitutional Monarchy Constitutional Republic Monarch, Governor-General President Prime Minister President Bicameral semi-elected Parliament Elected Congress Member of Parliament Representative And that's just the surface.
How does a Pharaoh differ from a king or queen?
a Pharaoh is from ancient Egypt and a king or queen is from some where else.
The president and congress differ in their?
Election cycle, Constituencies, and Constitutional Powers.
How did the rule of the stuarts differ from Elizabeth I?
more absolutist.
How did the rule of the Stuart's differ from Elizabeth I?
more absolutist.
How did the rule of the Stuart's differ from rule of Elizabeth I?
more absolutist.
How did rule of the Stuart's differ from the rule of Elizabeth I?
more absolutist.
