Want this question answered?
he was ruthless and had no mercy but he was also very smart
This question comes down to opinions. Some people think he was but others argue that he brought safety to the countries he ruled because of his army.
yes, he was ruthless and powerful, he was strong too. He did this so people would not rebel against him and illustrate to his people that he was stronger and more powerful (not everyone accepted him).
A ruthless conqueror. A benevolent dictator. A man with a mission to bring civilisation and prosperity to a region riven by war and degradation.
He was a bad leader because he killed a lot of his citizens on the road to war and after the Battle of Hastings. Almost all Monarchs were ruthless killers and didn't care how many people they killed.
Yes, the term 'more ruthless' is the comparative form of the adjective 'ruthless'. The superlative form is 'most ruthless'.
Ruthless is an adjective.
Presumably, that the person in question, who is ruthless, sex-obsessed, and single-minded, belongs to the speaker of the phrase, in some sense. As if someone were to describe their girlfriend: she's ruthless, sex-obsessed, singleminded, and (she's) all mine.
Ruthless Order was created in 2006.
Ruthless for Life was created in 1997.
sam was a really ruthless child
The duration of The Ruthless Four is 1.67 hours.