Yes. Conventional (filement based) light bulbs are very inefficient converters of electrical energy to light - around 2% efficiency. So compared with "low energy" bulbs, which are around 8% efficient, they are wasteful.
Fluorescent bulb is the more efficient one as compared to incandescent bulbs.
no
Conventional incandescent bulbs are extremely inefficient because they use a piece of wire heated to white heat to produce the light. That means that they also produce a lot of heat, which is wasted energy. CFL bulbs produce light more directly and they produce about one fifth of the amount of heat energy.
You are still allowed (please note spelling) to buy conventional tungsten bulbs at 100 watts, but not for much longer. We are encouraged to use the 'low energy' lamps which are 4 or more times more efficient in their use of electricity than tungsten bulbs, thus reducing energy use and reducing global warming.
LED lighting is more cost efficient in the long run, although the initial cost may be higher. Light Emitting Diodes use less power than conventional bulbs, and even fluorescent bulbs.
LED light fixtures are made out of clusters of very small, super energy efficient bulbs. Because many of those bulbs are used, LED lights can be built to mimic the effects of regular incandescent bulbs. A huge part of what makes LED bulbs so energy efficient is that they do not produce heat as incandescent light bulbs do.
Normal incandescent bulbs produce a lot of heat as well as light, so are not so efficient as low energy bulbs which can give the same light but consume much less electricity
Tube lights are more efficient than light bulbs.
Energy efficient table lamps are available in many online shops such as LampPlus and YLighting. Lamps can even be made energy efficient by changing the light bulbs to fluorescent spiral bulbs.
Yes, non energy efficient bulbs like the incandescents waste around 90% of there energy in the form of heat. LEDs and CFLs don't even come close.
Yes and less likely to break too