because Winston Churchill (British PM of that time) offered to give Hitler certain benefits which were confiscated as a result of the 1919 Treaty of Versailles (which was put in place after WW1 and blamed Germany for causing it) to prevent a second war. The policy was unsuccessful
The Axis Powers rolled their military forces through countries. Politics were swept away.
nationalism & imperialism :)
alliances is the most important long term reason
the report strengthened isolationist statement in the United States
I don't really think that democracy caused WWII. There were many other factors which contributed much more (if democracy did indeed cause it!) these were; An aggressive Germany under Hitler appeasement (namely by France and Britain) failure to recognize a true threat bitterness of Germans at their treatment at Versailles failure of the league of nations and so on.... i think to ask how democracy caused WWII is very vague as democracy did not cause WW2 at all!
It only made the axis-powers more and more powerful than they were before. Then, they unleashed it. But 5 years later, failed to keep it.
The German invasion of Poland... complements of THE DENNIS JONESGermany invading Polandthe German invasion of Poland
Appeasement will forever be associated with British Conservative Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain. In signing the Munich aggreement he appeals to Hitlers 'better nature'. Put simply Hitler didn't have a better nature. Appeasement is a vain attempt to avoid a repitition of WW1 in Europe.
The Axis Powers rolled their military forces through countries. Politics were swept away.
The important cause of world war 1 was the gverment and the need for power the germans had and the bad goverment
Appeasement. France and and Great Britain Where not ready to go to war again 'cause they had just got out of WWI and they were going through the Great Depression.
cause it wa sna
Chamberlain thought that by appeasing Germany and Hitler, he could prevent war. Chamberlain, and many in Britan, thought that the Treaty of Versailles was too harsh and by giving back the land taken from Germany (and more) they would make Germany/Hitler happy and war would never come.
The typical answer you will get is appeasement. However, a more thorough exploration into the events of the time shows that appeasement was merely a byproduct of the situation, rather than the cause as many would expect.Using the policies of appeasement, leaders agreed to hand over land in order to prevent war. The effect was entirely the opposite. In this case, the problem was not the foreign policy, but the logic behind the foreign policy. Those leaders thought that a thug (Hitler) would keep his word. They grossly misinterpreted Hitler. In addition, another cause was that these leaders and their nations had not built the respect needed to stop a tyrant like Hitler.The average person has a better grasp on the failures of appeasement after its great failure leading to WWII. However, we continue to see this losing strategy used in very recent history. For example, the Gaza Strip incident a few years back was very similar. The fundamental Muslims in the region said they would quit their fight against Israel in exchange for the contested Gaza Strip. President Obama urged Israel to surrender the land, claiming there would be peace. There are a great number of other examples, which everyone can still learn from.
nationalism & imperialism :)
the American policy changed and adopted the policy of isolation because of many causes but the main cause was recognition and acceptance it a problem of only Europe not of the world so this sense of alienation from the very order of Europe dragged her tofollow the policy of isolation
cause he made world war peace.