well, in my opinion, it helps us "have a deeper understanding" because we like, scientists and people like have these machines (I don't know what they're called) that, I think, when you put something in it, it analyzes what that thing is.
I can't think of anything else, im sorry, that's all I could come up with.
We need to study them to gain a deeper understanding of our world.
We need to study them to gain a deeper understanding of our world.
the path to understanding the world based on science is
Many fields of science would have to rethink their understanding of the world.
How isn't it? Science is the method of understanding the natural world. Is not History part of the natural world and has not Science been used in history?
We need to study them to gain a deeper understanding of our world.
We need to study them to gain a deeper understanding of our world.
the path to understanding the world based on science is
SCIENCE!
SCIENCE!
Basic science
Social science studies human behavior, society, and relationships, while technology science focuses on the development and application of technology to solve problems and improve efficiency. Social science aims to understand social phenomena, while technology science aims to innovate and create new technologies.
Yes. i.e. lightning rods
assumptions
Science improves technology by providing a deeper understanding of the natural world and allowing for the development of new theories and principles. This understanding is then applied in practical ways through engineering and research to create new technologies and improve existing ones. Science also drives innovation by constantly pushing the boundaries of knowledge and encouraging the development of more efficient and advanced technologies.
Scientific understanding of the world relies on empirical evidence, observation, and experimentation to explain natural phenomena and make predictions. It involves using the scientific method to formulate hypotheses, test them through repeatable experiments, and refine our understanding based on the results. This approach values objectivity, skepticism, and peer review to build a consensus on how the world works.
Many fields of science would have to rethink their understanding of the world.