0
It was a massive blow to the economy as the British Empire encompassed 25% of the world's population which Britain provided with manufactured goods.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did the US get Alaska and Canada did not?
The Russian Empire, fearing the loss of Alaska in a future conflict, hoped to sell it instead of losing it. They had hoped to start a bidding war between the U.S. and the British Empire, but the British weren't interested in buying it. Thus, the focus of the transaction became the United States.
How big is the British Empire now?
At the height of its power, the British Empire encompassed over 33 million km2 of land, the largest empire in history. The empire had territorial possessions in every continent, which led to the phrase "the sun never sets on the British Empire." By 1922 the British Empire held sway over about 458 million people, one-fifth of the world's population at the time.
Biggest loss for a British Army on American soil?
What was the biggest loss for a British Army on American soil before the American Revolution?
Why was the Battle of Charleston important?
Well, it was the biggest loss in the whole Revolutionary War. The British captured the Americans and the Americans finally surrendered, making the British own most of the Southern colonies.AnswerWell, the Battle of Charleston was the biggest loss in the Revolutionary War! The Americans lost almost their entire army. The British's win made them rule almost all of the southern colonies. See the links below.
What are the results of the Ottoman loss of monopoly over the Indian trade?
ottoman empire?
Why did the US get Alaska and Canada did not?
The Russian Empire, fearing the loss of Alaska in a future conflict, hoped to sell it instead of losing it. They had hoped to start a bidding war between the U.S. and the British Empire, but the British weren't interested in buying it. Thus, the focus of the transaction became the United States.
How big is the British Empire now?
At the height of its power, the British Empire encompassed over 33 million km2 of land, the largest empire in history. The empire had territorial possessions in every continent, which led to the phrase "the sun never sets on the British Empire." By 1922 the British Empire held sway over about 458 million people, one-fifth of the world's population at the time.
What did Carthage fear?
Loss of its trading empire.
What years did the cubs appear in the World Series?
1906-loss 1907-win 1908-win 1910-loss 1918-loss 1929-loss 1932-loss 1935-loss 1938-loss 1945-loss
Who is considered the founder of the Eastern Roman Empire?
There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.There is no founder of the eastern Roman empire. The Roman empire was divided into east and west by historians, not Romans. This was done for ease in relating events that occurred in either the west or the east. For example, when the western part of the empire fell to the barbarians, the Romans considered it a loss of territory, not a loss of half of an empire as some historians did.
Biggest loss for a British Army on American soil?
What was the biggest loss for a British Army on American soil before the American Revolution?
How did Empire end?
It was a combination of the loss in World War I and the different nationalities in the empire wanting independence.
What inherent flaws in humayuns character were responsible for the loss of mughal empire?
Hamayun didn't cause loss of Mughal Empire however he had to go for a 10 year Exile.
Is Nepal a member of the Commonwealth of Nations?
No, Nepal is not a member of the Commonwealth of Nations. Most members of the Commonwealth were once part of the British Empire and Nepal was never part of that Empire. Nepal remained an independent nation throughout its history. It fought against the British Empire in the Anglo-Nepalese War(1814-1816) which ended in the Treaty of Sunauli, resulting in a huge loss of of territory on the Nepali side but the British acknowledged Nepal's sovereignty and independence.
What has the author Graham Rhys-Jones written?
Graham Rhys-Jones has written: 'The loss of the Bismarck' -- subject(s): Bismarck (Battleship), British Naval operations, German Naval operations, World War, 1939-1945
When did the roman empire loss discipline in miltary?
ad 417
Why did the civilization crash before the renaissance?
Loss of the Roman empire
