If you mean XVIII then it is a Roman numeral equivalent to 18
It's C C C X X I V
Written as the product of only prime numbers, 60 = 2 x 2 x 3 x 5.
The above is invalid as a Roman numeral but V+I+I+X+I+V = XXIII (23)
On Converting between Arabic and Roman Numbers,we get : XXXVII in English numerals is written as : 37 where X=10 ,VII=7.
There is no need to repeat V in Roman numerals because V+V = X which means 5+5 = 10
The numbers are written like this: 1=I, 10=X 100=C 1000=M.
X!V-VI-MMV
70 written as a product of prime numbers: 2 x 5 x 7
It's C C C X X I V
Written as the product of only prime numbers, 60 = 2 x 2 x 3 x 5.
The above is invalid as a Roman numeral but V+I+I+X+I+V = XXIII (23)
On Converting between Arabic and Roman Numbers,we get : XXXVII in English numerals is written as : 37 where X=10 ,VII=7.
Z V. Bolkhovskikh has written: 'Khromosomnye chisla tsvetkovykh rastenii = chromosome numbers of flowering plants'
M. X. V. Drap-Arnaud has written: 'Le prisonnier de Newgate' -- subject(s): Accessible book
There is no need to repeat V in Roman numerals because V+V = X which means 5+5 = 10
The volume V of a rectangular prism is length L x width W x height H V = L x W x H
No such number May mean X V V X = 10 V = 5 10+5+5 = 20 Written as XX