Both are the remainders of stars, that is dead - that no longer produce energy. A third type of "dead star" is the white dwarf. What becomes of the star after it dies - a white dwarf, a neutron star, or a black hole - depends on its mass.
We aren't entirely certain how to measure the "size" of a black hole, other than by the mass. Is it the singularity itself? Or the event horizon?
Personally, I suspect that there is a lot going on in there that we currently have no clue about, and that if and when we finally understand it, we'll say "How could we have ever been so foolish?"
Mathmatically, the singularity is a point without a size; just mass. A neutron star is far LESS massive than a black hole, but the physical size is far larger; and the density far less than the "infinite" density of the black hole. (This is why I believe that we don't know everything there is to know about black holes, and that much of what we DO know, we don't yet understand. )
Isaac newton's laws of motion work very well UNTIL you get into the realm of the very small, very large, or very fast. Then you need to add in Einsteinian relativity to make things work.
I suspect that there is some other physical principle that will be needed to modify relativity to understand black holes.
Both have a large mass concentrated in a small space. Both are the result of the collapse of a fairly massive star - although in the case of a black hole, other mechanisms have been considered, too.
Both are remainders of stars, that ran out of fuel. (So are white dwarves.)
Black holes and planets are nothing alike. If the black hole is small enough than its gravitational pull may be the same as earths.
A black hole is so dense and has so much GRAVITATIONAL pull that not even light can escape it
They don't. At least, in no manner that is known.
yes
Yes, that's where they are. A black hole on Earth would utterly destroy the Earth, in a very short time.The existence of black holes is now generally accepted, by the way.
This will help the world by helping us more understand about black holes for when we are able to travel farther into the universe.
Never. A black hole on the Earth would destroy it completely.
Black holes are black holes - they are totally different from anything else in the universe. Most black holes are formed from the collapsed cores of dead stars. There are supermassive black holes in most galaxies, but it is no known how they formed.
I can't comprehend how suction would work in a vacuum :-) Black Holes' use their gravitational force to pull matter into them.
Black holes does emit radiation, but they cannot be detected from earth. We use gravitational lensing to "see" the black holes.
Earth is a planet. Center's of galaxies sometimes contain black holes. Planets can't be black holes.
Yes, that's where they are. A black hole on Earth would utterly destroy the Earth, in a very short time.The existence of black holes is now generally accepted, by the way.
No - at least no black holes as defined by physics.
No. Earth was formed by the accretion of material in the protoplanetary disk around the newly formed sun. Black holes were not involved.
The Earth has never been endangered or harmed by a black hole, and chances are, never will be.
No
Black holes could be dangerous to people if people were close to a black hole, but there are no black holes near the planet Earth (as far as we know) and the closest one is probably in the center of the Milky Way galaxy, which is about 80,000 light years from Earth, which is a safe distance.
Black holes emit so very little radiation they are hard to see. Many black holes lie at the center of galaxies and there they are hidden by stars and dust.
This will help the world by helping us more understand about black holes for when we are able to travel farther into the universe.
They don't. They never have. They never will.
Black holes are outside the confines of both the Earth and the Solar System, the passing of our year does not affect when they form.