In a direct democracy the people act as decision makers on all major issues. This can be at the national level or the village level. Everything of importance is voted on by all of the people.
In a representative democracy the people vote on representatives who act on their behalf either leading on issues or following the feelings of the people.
There are problems with both approaches.
A direct democracy must rely on someone to properly phrase the issue before the community. This phrasing is very important and people will not agree on the wording.
A representative democracy suffers from the problem of the representatives following their own insights and intuition on topics versus voting for the precieved will of the people.
Most units of government operate under some form of representative democracy.
In a direct democracy, citizens directly participate in decision-making by voting on laws and policies. In a representative democracy, citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. Both systems aim to reflect the will of the people, but direct democracy involves more direct involvement from citizens in decision-making compared to representative democracy.
The main difference between direct democracy and representative democracy is that direct democracy is a form of democracy where all laws and policies are created by a general vote of society while representative democracy is a form of democracy where citizens vote on representatives to create laws and policy on behalf of them.
Diversity enriches the world by bringing different perspectives, ideas, and cultures together. If everyone were alike, there would be limited opportunities for growth, learning, and innovation. Embracing differences leads to a more colorful and interesting world.
True democracy is better than other systems, as it gives people real control over their lives. But establishing true democracy will mean getting rid of the undemocratic, oppressive and exploitative system of capitalism.
APDTA is an english initialism that stands for many things including "All people don't think alike, All praise is due to Allah, All patriots don't trust America, All people don't travel alike." the list is growing.
Yes, people can find their non-biological twin through various methods such as using facial recognition technology, online databases, or social media platforms. Twins who look incredibly alike can sometimes be mistaken for identical twins, even though they are not biologically related.
Robert Sabuda's elaborately designed pop-up books have helped spark children's imaginations, improve fine motor skills, and foster a love of reading. His interactive books engage young readers in a unique way, making storytelling more exciting and memorable for them. Additionally, Sabuda's intricate pop-up artistry has inspired creativity and wonder in both children and adults alike.
they are to add to the number of representatives to have two houses of that are alike but different
its differnt becuase th Representitives change two years
The Founders of the United States strongly favored republican government over democracy for a variety of reasons. Fundamentally, however, they were suspicious of pure 'rule by the people' (which is democracy) because of its instability and difficulty alike; they deliberately chose instead to establish America as a republic, which combines some features of democracy with parliamentarian (and oligarchic) government for the sake of a 'representative democracy.'
Symbol is representative for a chemical element.Subscript is representative for the number of a specific atom in a molecule.
they both have a leader and both are a type of government.
they both deal with government, and have some sort of leader
The answer depends on what they are meant to be alike and different from!
how are fifteen and flatter alike and different
Both are federal presidential representative republics.
It's not. Democracy is a system of government owned and controlled by the will of the majority of the governed. The will of the people of a democracy would be the supreme law of their land. Unless the people officially choose to endow "representatives" with their rightful power to choose their destiny, any true democracy would necessarily be a direct democracy, because the true will of the majority of the people could only be acertained from a publicly owned, votable forum system capable of perpetually establishing truth about every issue, gradually and peacefully, in real time. There has never been a full-fledged democracy on Earth, for two main reasons. First, humanity only recently developed the computative, interactive and connective technology to define the true will of a population, a task that couldn't be done by horseback. And secondly, the small group (now the CFR) who enjoyed wielding Our power for generations has made a science of convincing us that We hold the power, in order to prevent losing their illegal reign over us and all we produce and own. But, it's obvious to all that our majority never voted for our current conditions of corrupt government, perpetual war, war profiteering, hunger, starvation, officially acceptable genocide, widening cultural divides, ever-widening gap between the rich and poor or ecological devastation of proportions that now threaten our extinction ~ myseries that none of us ever wanted ~ that could only benefit a psychologically unstable few. Countries which have been deceptively mislabeled as democracies by that tiny minority have equally tiny "degrees" or "aspects" of democracy: the vote. Some call them demockery, because they make a mockery of the very concept of democracy. It's a generational global deception of enormous magnitude. Having ballot boxes does not make a country a democracy. And, negative reality is a natural product of demockery. Direct democracy would be a political system which is owned and "directly" controlled by those it governs. Those affected by and/or with special knowledge of a particular public issue would raise the issue, then participate in the formulation of the most popular solution to that issue. Since the vast majority of people want peace and prosperity, that is what a direct democracy would produce. "Representative democracy" is a either just a deceptive misnomer or the name of a form of government yet to exist. America is a representative republic: Not a democracy by definition, as you were taught in public school. So, a representative democracy would require that each representative have a local votable forum system in which only his or her constituents could participate.
No, They are not alike as they have different size, features. There might be a similarity but in my view they arent alike. There food is different, there way of living is also different so in my opinion they are not alike.
i think alike