True democracy is better than other systems, as it gives people real control over their lives. But establishing true democracy will mean getting rid of the undemocratic, oppressive and exploitative system of capitalism.
Direct democracy is a form of government in which citizens have the ability to participate directly in decision-making processes, typically through voting on specific issues or policies rather than electing representatives to make decisions on their behalf. It allows for increased citizen engagement and empowerment in the political system.
Direct democracy is distinguished by allowing citizens to participate directly in decision-making processes rather than through elected representatives. This form of democracy typically involves frequent referendums, initiatives, and town hall meetings where individuals have a direct say in shaping policies and laws. It promotes greater citizen engagement and emphasizes the importance of individual voices in governance.
Direct democracy is a form of democracy where citizens directly participate in decision-making processes, voting on policies and laws themselves rather than through elected representatives.
Because a Democracy is the best form of government hands down. In a Democracy, people have freedom, people can speak freely, people have rights. Unlike in other countries where they have to believe what everybody else believes and they can only have one child and everything.
The history of "Democracy" started thousands of years ago in Greece, it was used to determine a rule the country with opinions of others, other countries like Canada, has adapted in the concept of Democracy.
I would say not really. But the bad democracy can progress where as the military rule will most likely become a terrible dictatorship and the democracy would (obviously) be better. This is my opinion.
military rule is better than civillian regime
If you are asking, "Is having a democracy safer and more civil then having the military run the country?" then the answer to that question is yes. From numerous studies, when the military are under control, there is violence, stronger laws and the up heave of "rebels". If the country is controlled by the "government" that is affiliated and sought strongly and solely on the basis of the military, then that is another story.in democratic system,people come to parliament through election by people.it means to say that all people are directly involved in the process of election.and if these parliamentarians will not deliver according to the wishes of the people,then in next election they will not win the confidence of people.and if there is free judiciary then corrupt politicians may be punished for their wrongdoings.so,democracy can be called the best system to run the state.but contrary to it,dictatorship is form of one man government.it is extremely inhuman way to manage the matters of state.worst democracy is even better than martial law.
Yes! Civillian rule is much better cus it is the power of the people while millitary rule is done through coercion.....
civilian rule is better than military rule because there is freedom and peace in the nation better than when the military was ruling us
Civil rule is better than military rule for several reasons. Firstly, civil rule is based on democratic principles, allowing for the participation of citizens in decision-making processes through elections and representation. This promotes inclusivity and diversity of perspectives, leading to more balanced and fair governance. Additionally, civil rule is generally associated with greater respect for human rights and freedoms, as military rule often involves restrictions on civil liberties in the name of maintaining order and security. Overall, civil rule provides a more stable and sustainable form of government that is accountable to the people it serves.
Well actually to be a good community you need both because think of segregation. If it were civilian rule black people would still be in separate schools and public places than white people. Military rule is bad sometimes because it may turn into a Dictatorship
Its not.
Usually it isn't. Behind the outward show of efficiency, military systems are too inflexible to operate smoothly, and many highly sinister types can be found hiding behind the raiment of respectability. Only when a country is descending into violent mob-rule or rotten with corruption do you have to send for the military. It's a pretty desperate cry for help.
Yes.
democracy
The military rules by force and not by the will of the people. Military rule is seldom for the good of the people. Civil rights, in fact basic human rights are often none existent under military rule.The military are AUTHORITARIAN in nature.The civilians gives room for public opinion which is lacking in military