Aside from a reduction in income, a rebuttable presumption argument can also be used. see links below
In California, under some circumstances, 20% is use. The argument can be made in other states under a rebuttable presumption. see links
Statutory presumption refers to a rebuttable or decisive presumption brought about by a statute.
It's not required under the CS guidelines, but is an option under a Rebuttable Presumption Argument. But, the use of that argument can swing both ways. see links
Fallacies of presumption occur when an argument is based on an unjustified assumption or presupposition. Examples include begging the question (assuming the truth of the conclusion in the premise), false dilemma (presenting only two options when more exist), and complex question (posing a question that assumes something not yet proven).
No. The only two people involved in the financial support are the parents. Not that the new husband won't end up spending some of his money on the child, but it is not his legal obligation and does not lessen the responsibility of the bio dad.
Generally no. California does allow for his income to be used in the calculations, but in others states, a rebuttable presumption argument needs to be made.
The root word of presumption is "presume." It comes from the Latin word "praesumere," which means "to take for granted."
CO only
There was a presumption of innocence as the jurors entered the courtroom.
presumption of negligence
This is a "rebuttable presumption." This means that with the right evidence, the presumption of innocence can be overcome and a defendant found guilty.