0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How might the West African oral tradition be different from written tradition?
The West African oral tradition can be different from written tradition because they never had a written language. Also they had storytellers that told West African traditions.It also may be different in similarity to the original. In oral traditions the stories are often altered by the person relaying the information, and traditions change slightly that way.
How does oral tradition differ from a written source?
history is normally written down and oral tradition isn't.
How might the west African tradition be different from written tradition?
The West African oral tradition can be different from written tradition because they never had a written language. Also they had storytellers that told West African traditions.It also may be different in similarity to the original. In oral traditions the stories are often altered by the person relaying the information, and traditions change slightly that way.
What is the opposite of oral?
written tradition
How do you use the word oral tradition in a sentence?
When no written record is available, we must rely on the oral tradition.
How might the West African oral traditions be different from written traditions?
The West African oral tradition can be different from written tradition because they never had a written language. Also they had storytellers that told West African traditions.It also may be different in similarity to the original. In oral traditions the stories are often altered by the person relaying the information, and traditions change slightly that way.
What is the opposite of oral tradition?
The opposite of oral tradition is written tradition, where knowledge, stories, and information are recorded and transmitted through written documents instead of being passed down through spoken word.
What has the author Mark Amodio written?
Mark Amodio has written: 'Writing the oral tradition' -- subject(s): English poetry, History, History and criticism, Oral communication, Oral tradition, Oral-formulaic analysis, Written communication
How does oral tradition differ from written source?
Oral tradition is information passed down through generations by word of mouth, while written sources are recorded information in written form. Oral tradition tends to be more fluid and changeable, influenced by the storyteller, while written sources are usually more fixed and can be referenced repeatedly. Written sources allow for greater precision and detail, while oral tradition relies on memory and interpretation.
What is written tradition?
Samuel Byrskog (Story as History) says writing was usually seen as supplementary to oral discourse and that it functioned as a memorandum of what the person already should remember from oral communication. Written tradition would then be the natural evolution of the oral tradition. Just as oral traditions (stories) changed from community to community so then the written tradition would follow.
History that is spoken not written?
That is called oral tradition.
What is true of an oral tradition?
They often take years to fine-tune.
