answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

That was not used in this case.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How is the exclusionary rule used in Jeffery Dahmer's case?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What supreme court case diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?

Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?


The Supreme Court case of Mapp v Ohio established the?

exclusionary rule


Which Supreme Court case was responsible for the creation of the exclusionary rule?

chimel v. califorina


What supreme court diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?

Supreme Court cases diminished the scope of the exclusionary rule?


The exclusionary rule is an example of a rule written?

to protect citizens' rights.


Why is the exclusionary rule a controversial provision in some legal circles?

Some potential consequences of the exclusionary law is that it could keep evidence that is pertinent to a case out of the courtroom. If it is the only evidence that could keep be used to convict a guilty person it is problematic.


Should the exclusionary rule be abandoned?

Yes, the Exculsionary Rule should be abandoned.


Evidence gained by the police from an illegal act is subject to which rule?

The Exclusionary Rule.


The US Supreme Court has declined to extend the exclusionary rule to searches conducted by whom?

The Supreme Court created an exception to the exclusionary rule for searches conducted by school administrators.


The constitution expressly provides for the exclusionary rule in?

Fourth Amendment


What is a great introduction to a Reflection Paper?

Probable cause and the exclusionary rule


What legal doctrine was established to control police misconduct?

The legal doctrine established to control police misconduct is called "qualified immunity." This doctrine protects government officials, including police officers, from being held personally liable for civil damages as long as their actions did not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights.