How did the new imperialism differs from the old imperialism?

Answer 1

There are many differences. One is that old Imperialism mostly used trade ports to trade merchandise with other countries- they also did it respectfully. New Imperialism wanted domination. Instead of trading peacefully, they decided to just take over the countries. New Imperialism was all about getting more money. I hope this helped!

Answer 2

It was different by economics, politics, and the motives they had. Economics: In the "old imperialism" it was about trade. They had an importance with buying off the natives that brought them the goods. They had trading spots along the coast of South Africa and islands by Asia and England. The "new imperialism" is all about money. They went into coutries and set up plantations, docks, and factories. They didn't want just trade.

Answer 3

'Old Imperialism' usually consisted of battle and conquest of land and forming of colonies. These imperialists mainly wanted to gain political prestige, and gain from their conquests economically. There is the old saying "Gold, Glory and God" (and in old imperialism, it was almost always in that order)

In 'New Imperialism', however, imperialist countries would involve economic means of establishing colonies and gaining power in them. They would hope to "civilize" the natives of the land, and educate them in their ways. Rudyard Kipling is an example of a writer who details in a poem titled "The White Man's Burden" that it is the duty of the white Europeans to "civilize" the "uncivilized" humans of other races. This, however, remains controversial over whether he was being critical of the idea itself (writing sarcastically) or whether he was serious.

Answer 4

huh