Imagine you are shining a torch on a globe, the top and the bottom would get the least light from the torch. The sun is like a torch for Earth, but the sun is much bigger than a torch shining on a much bigger ball. The sun's rays shine much more strongly in the middle of the Earth and much more weakly in the poles. The sun's rays create heat, and rays that are shining strongly create more heat. When I say this, you will be guessing that the equator is the hottest part of the Earth. Well actually it's not the hottest because of the Earth's tilt.
Near the Equator. It doesn't rain at the poles, and snowfall is almost non-existent at the South Pole.
The magnetic field is stronger at the poles.
Neither, it is in between.
Water evaporates more from areas near the equator.
The oceans are colder at the poles compared to the equator. Near the poles, polar regions experience colder temperatures and often have sea ice present, while the equator receives direct sunlight and is warmer, leading to higher ocean temperatures.
easedfsdf
Near the Equator. It doesn't rain at the poles, and snowfall is almost non-existent at the South Pole.
The climate near the equator is hot and dry, think of the Sahara desert. The climate near the north and south poles is very cold for almost the whole year.
It is nearer to the equator.
It is effectively the same distance from both.
Poles
The closer you are to the poles, the greater the change.
The magnetic field is stronger at the poles.
Yes, air near the equator is typically warmer than air near the poles due to the angle at which sunlight strikes the earth. Near the equator, sunlight is more concentrated, resulting in higher temperatures. In contrast, near the poles, sunlight is spread out over a larger area, leading to cooler temperatures.
Neither, it is in between.
The energy that reaches the equator is more intense than the energy that strikes poles
The water is saltier at the poles, and less salty at the equator.