Want this question answered?
Not well supported by the evidence and basically just assertion. Lamarck asserted that acquired characteristics, such as muscles developed during one's lifetime, were heritable. They are not. He also asserted that an organism had a " desire " to evolve. This was also not true.
Tito "Hoagie" Shaw supported the endangered species act.
You can easily refute the theory of evolution--just as easily as you can refute Newton's theory of gravity, or Einstein's theory of relativity. You just can't refute these theories using science or evidence with ease, as these theories are extremely well supported. If you could confirm the existence of fossil bunnies in undisturbed Cambrian strata, that would serve as excellent evidence of a fundamental flaw in Darwin's theory. If you could find a natural specie such as Kirk Cameron's crocaduck, evolution could not explain such a chimera, and forces at odds with Darwin's theory would obviously be at play.
Business Owners
no data, no conclusion, but the question has been answered.
Relative and absolute dating of the rocks and the fossils near it (geology and archaeology), as well as chemical components of various surrounding areas are consistent in explaining the diversity of life as explained by theory of evolution. Evolution is also consistent with embryology, genetics, comparative physiology, biochemistry, and more. See the related link below for more details.
Evolution may refer to both the observed phenomenon and the theoretical framework explaining observations in terms of what we know of that phenomenon. Phenomena need no support, just verification. Theories aren't usually supported by other theories, but by observational data. Just so for evolutionary theory: it's supported by the observations in embryology, genetics, comparative genomics, palaeontology, ethology, zoology, microbiology, molecular biology, and so forth.
Comparative anatomy is the investigation and comparison of the structures of different animals. Scientists use comparative anatomy to study the difference between species and how they are alike in other ways. ~ann :]
It is supported by data.
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
The supported the teching of evolution
The theory of evolution is not supported by incontrovertible evidence.
Scientists classify flowering plants based on characteristics such as the number and arrangement of flower parts, leaf structure, presence of fruit, and seed type. These characteristics help to group plants into different families and genera, making it easier to study and understand their relationships and evolutionary history.
It is a comprehensive explanatory body of well supported by the evidence concepts that go for in explaining the fact of evolution.
It does not. Paranormal activity is not supported by any evidence I am aware of.
Evolution is as logical as you can get. Supported by concrete evidence, corroborated by scientists worldwide, and put through the scientific method time and time again... it does not deviate into a subjective opinion. Those who don't believe the theory of evolution is logical clearly do not understand evolution.