Evolution may refer to both the observed phenomenon and the theoretical framework explaining observations in terms of what we know of that phenomenon. Phenomena need no support, just verification. Theories aren't usually supported by other theories, but by observational data. Just so for evolutionary theory: it's supported by the observations in embryology, genetics, comparative genomics, palaeontology, ethology, zoology, microbiology, molecular Biology, and so forth.
Evolution is a process, theories of evolution are theories which explain that process
Because although there is evidence to support the claims, it isn't possible to prove evolution indefinately.
Simply; none.
There are several different theories of evolution. The most successful is by Charles Darwin through natural selection.
There is only one central "theory of evolution", which is the theory of evolution by natural selection that Charles Darwin pioneered. There have been different theories in the past - such as Jean-baptise Lamarck's theory of acquired traits - but these lost their status of scientific theory when they were shown to be wrong.
Evolution is a process, theories of evolution are theories which explain that process
Because although there is evidence to support the claims, it isn't possible to prove evolution indefinately.
No, there are no other theories but the theory of evolution by natural selection that explain so much about evolution.
Simply; none.
Intelligent design, Hovind Theory Added: The above are not scientific theories but more ideological assertions in nature. No positive evidence supports either assertion.
Natural selection, I'm not sure, and Consumer-based evolution, respectively.
by making theories
endosymbiosis
In a phrase; the mechanism of natural selection.
Unanswerable.
He came up with the most widely accepted mechanism for evolution, known as natural selection.
There are none...at least none that have evidence to their favor.