because more people can afford things like oak furniture and this leads to more wood being needed
aka major deforistation
We are destroying rain forests NOT helping them.
Because homes of the tribes living in the rainforests are getting flooded
Find an economically sound reason to keep rainforests or to not destroy rainforests, and people will either try to keep the rainforests or at least stop destroying them. Also, use of force, probably through government, can stop many attempts to destroy rainforests.
we can do all staff to get money and help tropical rainforest
Companies use the rainforests for the timber and wood, which we use lots. Roads are built for easy access. Cattle ranchers need the open land for their cattle and clear forest. People such as miners are digging oil rigs. Medicine purposes - The rosy perriwinkle especially Tourism Coffee and fruit production
yes because co co beans grow there
Saves rainforests and gives wood without destroying natural mankind
Sort of, You could plant (lets say 100 trees) and cut down 100 trees or cut them down then plant them again
Australia has more than two types of rainforest. Australia has tropical rainforests, sub-tropical rainforests, warm temperate rainforests and cool temperate rainforests.
there are no rainforests in Slovakia
There are no rainforests in Canada.
trees are the rainforests