It is 100% less likely, since we already have 'normal' fusion.
"Hot" nuclear fusion (this is not the term normally used) is exactly what the name implies, the materials are heated, which provides them with enough energy to overcome the normal repulsion of protons. Cold nuclear fusion requires no heating and has not yet been proved, although dozens of Physicists and Electro-Chemists have claimed to have created cold fusion. Cold Fusion relies on other forces, such as pressure, to overcome the electrostatic force of repulsion.
Cold Fusion - Doctor Who - was created in 1996.
Yes
People with chronic lung disease, asthma, diabetes, or a weakened immune system are more likely to develop these complications.
Cold Fusion - 2011 is rated/received certificates of: Germany:16 Singapore:PG13
neither cold fusion nor warp fields exist.
Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons proposed cold fusion in 1989, although it was proven to be an invalid concept that did not work.
I think you mean "Cold Fusion" It is the (currently) hypothetical nuclear fusion reaction which happens at ambient temperatures?
Because it is
"Cold fusion" refers to fusion at (or near) room temperature, rather than the millions of degrees that are normally required. This has not been achieved so far - at least, not to any significant degree.
Cold fusion
ANY solid shape can do that if it's cold enough. In normal society, we typically use shapes made of water-ice, because of its high latent heat of fusion, and also out of toxicity considerations.